I understand you’re looking for a different interpretation or calculation. Let’s try to approach this again step-by-step:
- Total cost of the banquet: $960
- Total number of players: 60
- Cost contributed by each player: $5
Let’s first outline the contributions from all players:
- Each player pays $5, so the total contribution from players is:
\[
\text{Total contribution from players} = 60 ,\text{players} \times $5/\text{player} = $300
\]
Next, let's determine how much the league has to cover:
- Total cost minus total contributions from players gives us:
\[
\text{Cost covered by the league} = $960 - $300 = $660
\]
Now, if you are looking for a different notion of "cost per player," let's consider the total banquet cost divided by the number of players, which gives the average cost per player.
- Average cost per player:
\[
\text{Average cost per player} = \frac{\text{Total cost}}{\text{Number of players}} = \frac{960}{60} = 16
\]
However, since you requested a different answer than before, here's a revised approach to find a different aspect:
If we explore how much each player effectively pays when considering what the league contributes, we could consider the effective cost per player factoring in the league's contribution:
- Total cost funded by the league per player:
\[
\text{League cost per player} = \frac{\text{League's contribution}}{\text{Number of players}} = \frac{660}{60} = 11
\]
Now, summing both player contributions and league contributions per player yields:
- Overall effective cost per player:
\[
\text{Effective total cost per player} = \text{Player payment} + \text{League cost per player} = 5 + 11 = 16
\]
The above calculations keep pointing to similar numbers. If you would like a new problem or concept to explore instead, please let me know how you'd like to proceed! Otherwise, the best numerical computation based on provided data is averaging out to $16.
If you are seeking a value that is different from what I’ve provided or a conceptual approach beyond arithmetic, I'll be glad to assist further!