Each lab includes instructions or questions requiring the use of the internet to complete the task. Please use complete sentences and appropriate headings where applicable. If included, refer to the rubric below to see how you will be graded. Note that links open a new browser window. Submit your work as a file attachment using the dropbox. This lab is worth 10 points. UNIT 3 LAB How to Seek Truth in the Era of Fake News Discuss how her experiences reporting the Balkan Wars shaped Christiane Amanpour’s view of her own ethical responsibility as a journalist. Why did Amanpour believe she got so much pushback for publishing her articles about genocide in the Balkans? How does Amanpour feel that the internet and social media pose a danger to truth? Discuss whether you agree or disagree with her point. How is news spread on social media platforms different from the more traditional ways people used to receive their news? Explain why Amanpour believes the source is dangerous. Considering the media today, explain where Amanpour believes responsibility lies. How can fake news be prevented or discredited?

1 answer

UNIT 3 LAB: How to Seek Truth in the Era of Fake News

Impact of Reporting on Amanpour's Ethical Responsibility

Christiane Amanpour’s experiences during the Balkan Wars profoundly shaped her understanding of her ethical responsibilities as a journalist. Reporting on the harrowing realities of war, genocide, and human suffering, she witnessed firsthand the ramifications of misinformation and propaganda. Amanpour felt a profound obligation to tell the truth and provide a voice for the voiceless, considering journalism not just a profession but a moral commitment. The gravity of the situations she covered led her to believe that journalists hold a responsibility to uphold integrity and accuracy, especially when the stakes involve human lives.

Pushback Against Reporting on Genocide

Amanpour believes that the significant pushback she received for publishing her articles about genocide in the Balkans stemmed from a combination of factors. Some media outlets and individuals resisted her coverage because it highlighted uncomfortable truths that contradicted their narratives or political agendas. Additionally, there was a culture of denial and political maneuvering that sought to downplay or silence discussions about atrocities. For many, acknowledging these harsh realities required confronting complex geopolitical dynamics, which created resistance to her reporting.

Dangers of the Internet and Social Media

Amanpour has expressed concerns that the internet and social media pose substantial dangers to the truth. She argues that these platforms facilitate the rapid spread of misinformation, making it challenging for individuals to discern accurate reporting from falsehoods. The algorithms that drive social media often prioritize sensational content over truth, meaning that clickbait and misleading headlines can overshadow responsible journalism. I agree with her viewpoint; the ease with which misinformation can be disseminated online creates an environment where the truth is often overshadowed by sensationalism and polarizing narratives.

Differences in News Dissemination

The way news is spread on social media platforms differs significantly from traditional news dissemination methods. In traditional journalism, news is typically vetted through editorial processes and fact-checking before publication, which can take time but ensures a level of accountability and reliability. In contrast, social media allows for instantaneous sharing, where opinions and unverified information can go viral before being fact-checked, leading to the potential for widespread misinformation. This shift not only accelerates the dissemination of news but also blurs the lines between credible sources and personal opinions.

The Danger of Sources

Amanpour believes that the source of information is dangerous in the current media landscape. She highlights that many social media users consume news without critically assessing the sources or verifying the credibility of the information being shared. This lack of discernment can lead to the perpetuation of false narratives and undermine public trust in traditional news outlets. Misinformation can originate from various sources, including anonymous accounts or organizations with biased agendas, complicating the effort to identify reliable information.

Responsibility in Media Today

Amanpour believes that responsibility in today’s media landscape lies both with journalists and consumers of news. Journalists are tasked with maintaining high standards of reporting and accountability, while consumers need to become more discerning about the information they consume and share. Increasing media literacy among the public is essential for combating misinformation and fostering a culture of critical engagement with news.

Combating Fake News

To prevent or discredit fake news, a multifaceted approach is needed. This includes promoting media literacy education, implementing stricter regulations on social media platforms regarding the spread of misinformation, and encouraging critical thinking among news consumers. Additionally, fact-checking organizations play a vital role in debunking false claims and providing transparent information to the public. By fostering a culture that values accurate information and promotes critical engagement with media, society can work towards minimizing the impact of fake news.


In conclusion, Christiane Amanpour's experiences have significantly shaped her perspective on journalistic ethics, particularly regarding the importance of truth in reporting. The challenges posed by social media and the rapid dissemination of information highlight the need for a collective responsibility to uphold journalistic integrity and combat the spread of fake news.