To analyze Bob's statement, we can use the equation of exchange, which is represented as:
\[ MV = PY \]
Where:
- \( M \) = money supply
- \( V \) = velocity of money
- \( P \) = average price level of goods
- \( Y \) = real output (or real GDP)
If the money supply (\( M \)) is reduced, it can have several implications. According to the equation:
- If \( M \) decreases and \( Y \) (real output) remains constant in the short term, to maintain the equation, either \( V \) or \( P \) must also change.
- If Bob believes that there will be a decrease in the velocity of money (\( V \)) and an increase in the average price level (\( P \)), then it does not logically follow because a decrease in \( M \) paired with a decrease in \( V \) would lead to a decrease in \( P \), assuming \( Y \) is constant.
Considering these implications, the correct response would be:
c. Bob is not correct. If both the money supply and the velocity of money decreased, the average price level of goods would likely decrease as well.