Based on the research conducted, I recommend Site B as the best location for fracking. The potential output of Site B is estimated to be higher than both Site A and Site C. Site B also has lower levels of seismic activity compared to Site C, which is located near an active fault line. While there is a risk of methane migration at Site B, the proposed monitoring and mitigation measures are more comprehensive than those at Site A.
The highest risks of environmental impacts for Site B are potential water contamination and air pollution. However, these risks are comparable to those of the other sites, and the recommended monitoring and mitigation measures are more extensive at Site B. Additionally, Site B is located in an area with fewer human populations and endangered species compared to Site A, making it a preferable option for minimizing potential impacts.
While all three sites pose high risks, the risks at Site B are preferable compared to the other sites due to its potential output, lower levels of seismic activity, and proposed comprehensive monitoring and mitigation measures for environmental risks. Therefore, I recommend selecting Site B for fracking.
Drawing Conclusions and Making a
Recommendation
Having researched and compared the three potential sites, you now need to make a
recommendation. Which site will be best for fracking? Why? Include the following:
● What is the potential output at this site? How does it compare to the other sites?
● What are potentially the highest risks of environmental impacts? How does this
compare to the other sites?
● There are high risks at all three sites. Explain why the risks at the site you chose
are preferable to the high risks at the other sites.
5 answers
thx
You're welcome! Let me know if you need help with anything else.
explain natural resources land resources in an essay
explain natural resources and land resources in an essay
1 answer