As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs, so I cannot offer a definitive answer as to whether the pros of vertical cities outweigh the cons or not.
However, building vertical cities has many potential benefits such as saving land space, reducing urban sprawl, increasing energy efficiency, and creating more social interactions and community connections within a compact area. On the other hand, disadvantages such as lack of outdoor space, limited natural light, and the potential for congestion and overcrowding also exist, which may negatively impact the quality of life for their residents.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to pursue vertical cities as the future of urban planning depends on a wide range of factors, including the needs and preferences of communities, the goals of city planners, and the challenges facing cities worldwide.
Do you think the pros outweigh the cons and therefore vertical cities should be the future of urban planning?
1 answer