In Guy de Maupassant's short story "The Necklace," the actual value of the necklace is ultimately revealed to be insignificant compared to the perception of value and the societal expectations associated with it. Mathilde's transformation at the ball is indeed largely tied to the necklace’s presumed value, which plays a crucial role in her sense of identity and social standing.
At the ball, Mathilde feels elevated as she wears the necklace, which she believes to be a magnificent piece worth a great deal. This perceived wealth allows her to experience the luxury and admiration she craves. Maupassant writes, “She was the prettiest woman, elegant and sought after, and she was envied.” The necklace serves as a symbol of wealth that instills confidence and allows her to fully engage in the high-society experience.
However, when it is revealed that the necklace is fake and holds no real value, the story underscores the futility of Mathilde's desires and the harsh reality of her situation. The narrative emphasizes that her downfall stems from her fixation on appearances and societal validation. Maupassant illustrates this when he states, “What was the use of this misfortune for her, if she had not been so proud, so unhappy?” This encapsulates the idea that her obsession with a higher status and the appearance of wealth led to her downfall.
In summary, the actual value of the necklace matters less than its perceived value, which allows Mathilde to temporarily escape her dissatisfaction and feel a sense of belonging and worth. This illusion ultimately becomes her tragic flaw, as it leads to years of hardship and suffering when she is forced to replace the lost necklace. Thus, the necklace's role serves as a catalyst for her metamorphosis at the ball, highlighting the themes of vanity, pride, and the deceptive nature of appearances.
1 answer