I think there's too much generalization going on in that paragraph! You can read about generalizations and other fallacies here:
http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/fallacies/
I think it all depends on the wording used. The men who hijacked the planes on 9/11/01 considered themselves Muslims, and yet there are many Muslims all over the world who deplore what they did.
Throughout history, this "I'm right; you're wrong; let's attack" mentality has occurred in various places with various religions (or no religious connection at all). Consider these, which are directly connected with Christianity:
Crusades (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades )
The long, drawn-out IRA conflicts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Republican_Army and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Republican_Army_(1922%E2%80%931969) )
Westboro Church (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church )
I am Christian ... and I deplore the actions of the people involved in these actions, past and present.
So the question is ... do you agree with your teacher or not? How will you explain yourself?
Do you agree with my teacher???
The thing that is wrong is they say "Islamist" are terrorist ever since 9/11; and they are not the ones who took over the plane and crashed the twin towers. Also, there is no such thing as Islam terrorism could i say christian terrorism, no because it makes no sense if you really look into it. But, Islam is a religion that worships only one God.... and is that fair to include that. Islam means peace in Arabic. So, this means they were not Muslims or even considered close to a Muslim who took over the plane. They should say terrorist or something different But, not interfere with anyone's religion. :)
2 answers
k, thx