Ask a New Question
Menu

Directions: Use the rubric below as a guide in completing your portfolio. Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) Points Awarded Data Collection Data collection is complete, accurate, and detailed within the tables provided on the Lab Report Worksheet. Data collection is accurate, but there are 1–2 minor omissions from the data tables provided on the Lab Report Worksheet. Data collection includes 3 or more inaccuracies or omissions in the data tables provided on the Lab Report Worksheet. Data collection is incomplete or inaccurate. Little effort was made to record data in the data tables provided on the Lab Report Worksheet. Draw Conclusions: Summarizing Ideas Answers to the Draw Conclusions questions on the Lab Report Worksheet are complete and accurate. The answers provide relevant evidence from the simulation and compelling reasoning. Answers to the Draw Conclusions questions on the Lab Report Worksheet are complete, but might include minor errors. The answers provide relevant evidence from the simulation and adequate reasoning. Answers to the Draw Conclusions questions on the Lab Report Worksheet are incomplete or include several errors. The answers provide inadequate evidence or reasoning. Answers to the Draw Conclusions questions on the Lab Report Worksheet are incomplete and include several errors. Evidence and reasoning are weak or absent. © 2019 Pearson Online & Blended Learning K–12 USA. All rights reserved. Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) Points Awarded Draw Conclusions: Apply Description of the spectrum produced by Betelgeuse is correct and complete. Description of the spectrum produced by Betelgeuse is correct. It may omit one important characteristic. Description of the spectrum produced by Betelgeuse includes both correct and incorrect statements, indicating incomplete understanding. Description of the spectrum produced by Betelgeuse is incorrect. Little understanding of stellar spectra is shown. Writing Conventions There is a strong command of conventions Punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are correct. There is a general command of conventions. Punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are mostly correct. There is a partial command of conventions. Punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are inconsistent or weak. Errors in conventions may occasionally interfere with meaning. There is a limited command of conventions. Punctuation and capitalization are mostly incorrect. There are multiple errors in spelling. Errors in conventions often interfere with meaning.

1 answer

It looks like you're looking for guidance on how to evaluate a portfolio based on a rubric for a Lab Report Worksheet. To assist you further, I can help you understand how to interpret and apply each of the criteria effectively. Here’s a breakdown of the criteria and potential approaches to achieving higher scores:

Data Collection

  • Excellent (4): Ensure all data is meticulously recorded. Detail each point, measurement, or observation without missing any relevant information. Double-check for accuracy and completeness.
  • Good (3): Review your data for any minor omissions. Make sure that you have generally covered all necessary details, but if something is slightly off or lacks clarity, it might affect your score.
  • Fair (2): Identify the inaccuracies or omissions in your data collection. Aim to improve by adding missing information or correcting mistakes.
  • Poor (1): If your data collection is incomplete or lacking effort, consider revisiting the experiment and re-recording your findings. Document the process thoroughly this time.

Draw Conclusions: Summarizing Ideas

  • Excellent (4): Provide thorough responses that back your conclusions with specific evidence from the simulation. Craft your reasoning to be compelling and logically sound.
  • Good (3): While your answers are mostly correct, ensure there aren’t any minor flaws. You should nonetheless support your conclusions clearly with evidence.
  • Fair (2): Look for specific areas where your reasoning is weak or where evidence is missing. Aim to clarify and strengthen your responses.
  • Poor (1): If your answers are primarily incorrect or lack relevant evidence, a comprehensive revision is necessary. Focus on understanding the underlying concepts and ensuring your conclusions are well-supported.

Draw Conclusions: Apply

  • Excellent (4): Focus on delivering a nuanced and complete description of the spectrum produced by Betelgeuse. Highlight all relevant characteristics.
  • Good (3): Similar to the above, but ensure to include all critical traits in your description. Check if any details could enhance your understanding.
  • Fair (2): If your description mixes correct and incorrect statements, start by clarifying each aspect of the spectrum to understand what is accurate and why.
  • Poor (1): Revise your understanding of stellar spectra. Look at sources or study materials to build up a foundational understanding of how these spectra are produced.

Writing Conventions

  • Excellent (4): Proofread your work multiple times. Ensure that every sentence is grammatically correct and flows smoothly.
  • Good (3): Double-check for any punctuation or capitalization errors. Make sure your writing feels polished.
  • Fair (2): If your writing seems inconsistent, review the basic rules of grammar and spelling. Consider using writing aids or tools to support you.
  • Poor (1): If errors are hindering understanding, consider seeking assistance from peers or instructors to ensure clarity and correct usage before submission.

Scoring

Add the points awarded for each category to get a total score. Aim to strengthen your work in the areas where you scored lower in order to achieve a better overall score.

Feel free to share any specific data or conclusions you have in mind, and I can help you refine those points further based on this rubric!