Claim #1's conclusion argues against the use of Artificial Intelligence in education, stating that it would hinder students' ability to learn and think for themselves. The reasoning seems to be based on the belief that AI would make students lazy and negatively impact their intelligence. This argument does not seem sound as it lacks evidence to support the claims made.
On the other hand, Claim #2's conclusion supports the use of AI in education, emphasizing its potential to enhance personalized learning experiences for students. The reasoning behind this argument is that AI can cater to individual learning needs and provide real-time feedback. This claim seems to have relevant evidence to support the idea that AI can positively impact education by adapting to students' unique learning styles and abilities.
Directions: Read the conclusion of both claims below to evaluate the argument, “Should Artificial Intelligence (AI) be used in education?
In a short paragraph, 4 to 5 sentences,
State: What is the claim of each conclusion, summarize each claim. (2 sentences, 2 pts)
State whether the reasoning for each argument is sound? (1 sentence, 1 pt)
Determine does each claim have relevant and sufficient evidence? Explain how you know? (2 sentences, 2 pts)
(5 pts) Click here for Rubric
Conclusion of Claim #1: Based on the stated facts and evidence in the podcast above, using Artificial Intelligence would affect the education of students. The next generation of this world would not have the same ability to write and think clearly. If everyone uses AI to answer questions and write essays, then what is the point of having proper education? Students should all strive to learn and do their best on their own, but if students get used to a chatbot doing it all for them then what true intelligence do they have? Everyone is capable of learning and doing good, they just have to take the time to do so.
Conclusion of Claim #2: In conclusion, AI in education holds lots of potential to enhance personalized learning experiences for students without jeopardizing human connections. By personalizing lessons and providing real time feedback, AI contributes to a more effective educational environment. AI should be embraced for its ability to cater to individual learning needs, as it can adapt to a student's pace and style. Some argue though that AI might hinder human connection in the learning process, but I think the possibilities that AI offers in education are endless, and it’s responsible implementation can ensure a brighter future for students regardless of learning ability
(5 points)
3 answers
follow the prompt
Directions: Read the conclusion of both claims below to evaluate the argument, “Should Artificial Intelligence (AI) be used in education?
In a short paragraph, 4 to 5 sentences,
State: What is the claim of each conclusion, summarize each claim. (2 sentences, 2 pts)
State whether the reasoning for each argument is sound? (1 sentence, 1 pt)
Determine does each claim have relevant and sufficient evidence? Explain how you know? (2 sentences, 2 pts)
Directions: Read the conclusion of both claims below to evaluate the argument, “Should Artificial Intelligence (AI) be used in education?
In a short paragraph, 4 to 5 sentences,
State: What is the claim of each conclusion, summarize each claim. (2 sentences, 2 pts)
State whether the reasoning for each argument is sound? (1 sentence, 1 pt)
Determine does each claim have relevant and sufficient evidence? Explain how you know? (2 sentences, 2 pts)
Claim #1's conclusion argues against the use of Artificial Intelligence in education, stating that it would hinder students' ability to learn and think for themselves. The reasoning seems to be based on the belief that AI would make students lazy and negatively impact their intelligence. This argument does not seem sound as it lacks evidence to support the claims made.
On the other hand, Claim #2's conclusion supports the use of AI in education, emphasizing its potential to enhance personalized learning experiences for students. The reasoning behind this argument is that AI can cater to individual learning needs and provide real-time feedback. This claim seems to have relevant evidence to support the idea that AI can positively impact education by adapting to students' unique learning styles and abilities.
On the other hand, Claim #2's conclusion supports the use of AI in education, emphasizing its potential to enhance personalized learning experiences for students. The reasoning behind this argument is that AI can cater to individual learning needs and provide real-time feedback. This claim seems to have relevant evidence to support the idea that AI can positively impact education by adapting to students' unique learning styles and abilities.
1 answer