Data Collection Strategy for the Study
1. Research Design:
- A mixed-methods approach will be employed, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques. This will help in gaining a comprehensive understanding of student stress and the effectiveness of implemented strategies.
2. Quantitative Data Collection:
-
Surveys and Questionnaires:
- Develop a standardized survey to assess student stress levels, mental health awareness, and the effectiveness of existing school-based mental health strategies. The survey may include validated scales like the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7).
- Distribution: Surveys will be administered online through platforms like Google Forms or SurveyMonkey to increase participation rates.
-
Institutional Data:
- Collect data from school records on student performance, absenteeism, and disciplinary actions to explore correlations between stress levels and academic outcomes.
3. Qualitative Data Collection:
-
Focus Groups:
- Organize focus group discussions with students, teachers, and counselors to gather in-depth insights into their experiences with stress and the effectiveness of mental health initiatives.
-
Interviews:
- Conduct semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, including school administrators and mental health professionals, to understand the implementation process of strategies aimed at reducing student stress.
-
Observational Studies:
- Observe classroom environments and school activities to assess how students interact and cope with stress in real-time. This can provide context to survey and interview findings.
4. Data Analysis:
-
Quantitative Analysis:
- Use statistical software (e.g., SPSS or R) to analyze survey results, employing descriptive statistics and inferential statistics to identify significant trends and associations.
-
Qualitative Analysis:
- Apply thematic analysis or coding methods to interview and focus group transcripts to extract common themes related to student stress and the effectiveness of strategies implemented.
5. Ethical Considerations:
- Obtain informed consent from participants and ensure confidentiality throughout the study. Ethical approval will be sought from relevant educational and institutional review boards.
Reference List
-
Cohen, S., Kessler, R. C., & Gordon, L. U. (1997). Strategies for measuring stress in studies of mental health. In Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists (pp. 3-26). Oxford University Press.
-
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.
-
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company.
-
Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Consequences of adolescent drug use: Impact on academic and social adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(1), 89-104.
-
Roff, S. R. (2004). A longitudinal study of stress, coping, and adaptation among Spanish and Anglo adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(2), 161-167.
-
Ronk, K. S., & Brown, A. (2020). Fostering mental health in schools: A review of school-based interventions. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 22(3), 131-142.
-
Tiwari, R. R., & Kaur, J. (2019). The impact of socio-economic status on student mental health. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 24(3), 345-352.