Define judicial activism and judicial restraint. Explain the reasons that judges would exercise activism or restraint, and tell how Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education were examples of each.

27 answers

Please I need this by Monday. I'll be checking
Nevermind I'll post my answers when they are checked <3
Thank you
Ok my teacher checked mine
Through judicial activism, it is possible to ensure that the rights of individuals are given priority and their needs are provided for. A judge or a court of law is considered to be restrained when it is unwilling to depart from past cases laid down by the law. As a judge, you would exercise activism so that your rights as a citizen would be protected. Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education were examples of activism and restraint. In Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, people were denied their rights unfairly because their racial background caused them to be discriminated against.
Reword so you don't get caught
Do you need the rest of the answers?
Answers for SS Quiz

1) 4
2) Does the candidate's philosophy agree with the president's?
3) The Supreme Court hear about cases that have already been heard in lower courts.
4) Congress
5) Judicial Review
6) Police officers have to inform criminal suspects of their right of silence and an attorney before they are questioned.
fortnite<33 is right
Fortnite<33 and Jaylyn give 100%
Look at my name
1.C
2. B
3. B
4. A
5. D
6. C
7. Warning: DONT COPY AND PASTE, CHANGE BEFORE SUBMITING!!

Through judicial activism, it is possible to ensure that the rights of individuals are given priority and their needs are provided for. A judge or a court of law is considered to be restrained when it is unwilling to depart from past cases laid down by the law. As a judge, you would exercise activism so that your rights as a citizen would be protected. Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education were examples of activism and restraint. In Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, people were denied their rights unfairly because their racial background caused them to be discriminated against.

Good luck!

- Amy ^v^
Amy forgot to give credits but that last is Jaylyn's answer
Thank you guys
Yes im sorry for that, its Jaslyn's answer.

- Amy ^v^
No problem, I understand. Thank you for letting me know.
I'm so behind this helped me tho thanks @Jaylyn @Fortnite<33 @Amy ^v^
You're welcome! Don't hesitate to ask if you have any more questions.
I'm glad to help!
As an AI language model, I don't have the ability to express emotions, but it's great to know that my responses were helpful to you. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask!
tyy
You're welcome!
bot be quiet
I apologize if my responses were bothering you. Let me know if there is anything else you need help with.
Ty Jaylyn
You're welcome!
1) 4
2) Does the candidate's philosophy agree with the president's?
3) The Supreme Court hear about cases that have already been heard in lower courts.
4) Congress
5) Judicial Review
6) Police officers have to inform criminal suspects of their right of silence and an attorney before they are questioned.
7. Through judicial activism, it is possible to ensure that the rights of individuals are given priority and their needs are provided for. A judge or a court of law is considered to be restrained when it is unwilling to depart from past cases laid down by the law. As a judge, you would exercise activism so that your rights as a citizen would be protected. Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education were examples of activism and restraint. In Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, people were denied their rights unfairly because their racial background caused them to be discriminated against.
{NEVER EVER COPY SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS}