To evaluate the ethical conduct of the Curro marketing team in their career day event images through the lens of Aristotle's Golden Mean, it is essential to first understand what the Golden Mean is. Aristotle's ethical framework asserts that moral virtue lies between two extremes—excess and deficiency—and that a virtuous action involves finding a balance or mean that is appropriate to the situation.
Application of Aristotle's Golden Mean
In the context of the Curro campaign, one could identify various relevant virtues and extremes:
-
Representation vs. Stereotyping: The images posted suggest a scenario where a black child is depicted in a subservient role while white children depict more aspirational or professional roles. Ethically, the virtue lies in fair representation, which avoids reinforcing stereotypes. Excess would involve highlighting racial distinctions in a way that perpetuates discrimination, while deficiency would entail ignoring existing societal roles and expectations completely.
-
Creativity vs. Insensitivity: The marketing team's endeavor to creatively showcase career roles aimed at inspiring children is commendable and aligns with promoting ambition and aspiration. However, if the portrayal lacks racial sensitivity, it can devolve into insensitivity. The Golden Mean here involves creatively representing diversity without reinforcing damaging stereotypes.
-
Consent vs. Responsibility: While the school claims parental consent was obtained, ethical conduct must also consider the responsibility of the institution to protect the dignity of all its students, regardless of racial background. The mean involves not only obtaining consent but also ensuring that the resulting portrayal does not contribute to systemic inequalities or harm to the children's societal perception.
Evaluation of Ethical Conduct
When evaluating Curro's actions according to Aristotle's Golden Mean:
-
Proportionate Representation: If the intention was to inspire all children, the portrayal of the black child solely in a cashier role while white children occupy aspirational roles could be seen as an ethical failing. The portrayal lacks balance and reinforces a stereotype, moving towards the extreme of perpetuating racial divides rather than achieving the mean of equitable representation. The ethical path would necessitate a broader representation of roles across all children, demonstrating aspirations that encompass a variety of professions for all races.
-
Creative Sensitivity: The creativity in showcasing various career paths is a noble effort, yet this effort must be coupled with sensitivity to racial dynamics in society. If the images reinforce a negative or limiting narrative for black children, then the marketing strategy would fail to embody ethical conduct by lacking the requisite balance.
-
Broad Responsibility: A basic ethical responsibility goes beyond mere consent; it entails an awareness of the societal implications of the messages being disseminated. The educational environment should be a safe space that encourages all students.
Conclusion
In light of Aristotle's Golden Mean, it can be determined that the Curro marketing team may have acted unethically in the creation of their campaign. The portrayal exhibited an imbalance in representation, leaning towards racial stereotyping, while failing to encapsulate the full spectrum of diversity in professional roles. Moreover, while consent was obtained, the deeper ethical responsibility to reflect equality and foster positive representations for all children was not adequately met. For ethical marketing practices, it would be important to strive for reflectivity, ensuring that portrayals in educational contexts foster inclusivity and avoid reinforcing societal biases. Thus, the actions of the Curro marketing team appear to fall short of the ethical standards set forth by Aristotle's concept of the Golden Mean.
1 answer