To determine which scatterplot shows a linear association, we should look for a pattern where the points roughly form a straight line, whether ascending or descending.
Let's analyze each of the datasets:
-
Scatterplot 1:
- Points: (5, 800), (8, 700), (2, 350), (4, 450), (6, 500), (12, 1000), (10, 900), (1, 250), (3, 400), (7, 750)
- This dataset shows a general downward trend in the y-values as x increases, but there are some points that deviate significantly (around (12, 1000)), which makes it less linear.
-
Scatterplot 2:
- Points: (5, 550), (8, 800), (2, 250), (4, 300), (6, 700), (12, 1000), (10, 650), (1, 300), (3, 100), (7, 700)
- This dataset seems to have varying trends, and some points do not form a linear pattern, especially the point (1, 300) and (3, 100).
-
Scatterplot 3:
- Points: (5, 550), (8, 800), (2, 350), (4, 450), (6, 700), (12, 1000), (10, 900), (1, 250), (3, 400), (7, 750)
- Similar to the previous data, it does not present a strong linear association.
-
Scatterplot 4:
- Points: (5, 550), (8, 800), (2, 250), (4, 500), (6, 500), (12, 400), (10, 650), (1, 150), (3, 400), (7, 750)
- This scatterplot shows more random variability without a clear linear trend.
Conclusion: None of the scatterplots exhibit a clear linear association, however, based on the observations:
- If forced to choose, Scatterplot 1 shows the closest to a linear association trend (despite the outlier) because most other plots have more variability and less directionality in their trends.
To make a more informed decision, it's essential to visually examine actual scatterplots based on the provided data points. If visual representation is available, it would significantly aid in this analysis.