The mistake is in Statement 2. The correct conclusion should reflect that the angles formed by the transversal \(DE\) with the parallel lines \(AC\) and \(BC\) yield the following relationships:
- \(\angle DBA \cong \angle A\) (not \(\angle B\))
- \(\angle EBC \cong \angle C\) (not \(\angle A\))
The corrected statement should therefore read:
Statement 2 should say: \(\angle DBA \cong \angle A\); \(\angle EBC \cong \angle C\).
This indicates that the alternate interior angles are equal due to the fact that line \(DE\) is parallel to line \(AC\). The original proof incorrectly stated that \(\angle DBA\) is congruent to \(\angle B\), which is not correct based on the position of points \(D\) and \(E\).
Thus, the correct choice would be:
Statement 2 has a mistake. It should say \(\angle DBA \cong \angle A\); \(\angle EBC \cong \angle C\).