Consider the following proof of the Base Angles Theorem. Which statement should fill in the blank? PROOF: Given isosceles △ABC with AB¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅BC¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ , I can construct BD←→ , the angle bisector of ∠B . _____________________. I also know that line segments are congruent to themselves, so BD¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅BD¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ by the reflexive property of congruence. I now have two pairs of sides and an included angle that are congruent, so I know that △ABD≅△CBD by the SAS Congruence Theorem. Finally, corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent by the CPCTC Theorem, so ∠A≅∠C . (1 point) Responses Then, by the definition of an angle bisector, I know that ∠BAC≅∠BCA . Then, by the definition of an angle bisector, I know that angle upper B upper A upper C congruent to angle upper B upper C upper A . Then, by the definition of an isosceles triangle, I know that AB¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅CA¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ . Then, by the definition of an isosceles triangle, I know that Modifying above upper A upper B with bar congruent to Modifying above upper C upper A with bar . Then, by the definition of a midpoint, I know that AD¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅DC¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ . Then, by the definition of a midpoint, I know that Modifying above upper A upper D with bar congruent to Modifying above upper D upper C with bar . Then, by the definition of an angle bisector, I know that ∠ABD≅∠CBD . Then, by the definition of an angle bisector, I know that angle upper A upper B upper D congruent to angle upper C upper B upper D . Skip to navigation

Answer 1

The statement that should fill in the blank is:

"Then, by the definition of an angle bisector, I know that ∠ABD≅∠CBD."

This completes the logical sequence of the proof effectively, as it directly relates to the construction of the angle bisector \( BD \) and establishes congruence of the angles formed by the bisector.