We know that a left-hand Riemann sum is an underestimate for the area because it approximates the area using rectangles whose heights are determined by the function values at the left endpoints of each subinterval. Since the function is increasing over the interval [2,10], the left endpoint of each subinterval will always give a smaller function value than the right endpoint, resulting in smaller rectangles and thus an underestimate of the area.
Similarly, a right-hand Riemann sum is an overestimate for the area because it approximates the area using rectangles whose heights are determined by the function values at the right endpoints of each subinterval. Since the function is increasing over the interval [2,10], the right endpoint of each subinterval will always give a larger function value than the left endpoint, resulting in larger rectangles and thus an overestimate of the area.
Consider \int(x+ln(x))^(1/3)dx with limits [2,10].
a) Explain how you know a left hand Riemann sum will be an underestimate for A, and a right hand Riemann sum will be an overestimate.
3 answers
Actually, since the graph is concave down on [2,10] the left sum will be an overestimate
You are correct, I apologize for my mistake. If the function is concave down, then the left-hand Riemann sum will actually be an overestimate, while the right-hand Riemann sum will still be an underestimate. This is because the left-hand Riemann sum will use rectangles whose heights are determined by the function values at the left endpoints of each subinterval, which will be larger than the true function values. Conversely, the right-hand Riemann sum will use rectangles whose heights are determined by the function values at the right endpoints of each subinterval, which will be smaller than the true function values.
3 answers