Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Consider a long charged straight wire that lies fixed and a particle of charge +2e and mass 6.70E-27 kg. When the particle is a...Asked by Ed
"Consider a long charged straight wire that lies fixed and a particle of charge +2e and mass 6.70×10-27 kg. When the particle is at a distance 1.61 cm from the wire it has a speed 2.70×105 m/s, going away from the wire. When it is at a new distance of 2.71 cm, its speed is 3.40×106 m/s. What is the charge density of the wire?"
This is my attempt.
From conservation of energy we can find the electric field:
KE(i) + U(i) = KE(f) + U(f)
1/2mv(i)2 + qV(i) = 1/2mv(f)2 + qV(f) (v here is speed, V is potential)
Some algebra leads us to this:
Δ(V) = m(v(i)2 - v(f)2 )/(2q)
Since E = Δ(V)/Δ(d)
Then:
E = m(v(i)2 - v(f)2 )/(2q * Δ(d))
I find the same answer using kinematics:
F = ma = qE and v(f)2 = v(i)2 + 2aΔd so we can find figure out E
Finally, using Gauss's law:
The field generated by an infinite (long) wire is:
E = lambda/(2piR*epsilon)
Plugging in my expression for E and working out the algebra, I end up with:
lambda = m(v(i)2 - m(f)2 )*2piR(epsilon)/(2qΔd)
Which "R" do I use here? In other words, what is the radius of my Gaussian surface? Or is my entire approach completely wrong?
This is my attempt.
From conservation of energy we can find the electric field:
KE(i) + U(i) = KE(f) + U(f)
1/2mv(i)2 + qV(i) = 1/2mv(f)2 + qV(f) (v here is speed, V is potential)
Some algebra leads us to this:
Δ(V) = m(v(i)2 - v(f)2 )/(2q)
Since E = Δ(V)/Δ(d)
Then:
E = m(v(i)2 - v(f)2 )/(2q * Δ(d))
I find the same answer using kinematics:
F = ma = qE and v(f)2 = v(i)2 + 2aΔd so we can find figure out E
Finally, using Gauss's law:
The field generated by an infinite (long) wire is:
E = lambda/(2piR*epsilon)
Plugging in my expression for E and working out the algebra, I end up with:
lambda = m(v(i)2 - m(f)2 )*2piR(epsilon)/(2qΔd)
Which "R" do I use here? In other words, what is the radius of my Gaussian surface? Or is my entire approach completely wrong?
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.