Consequences of Adding Functionality Quick Check 3 of 33 of 3 Items Question What can be the consequences of updating only one module of legacy software irrespective of its effect on other modules?(1 point) Responses It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules. It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules. It is a reason for one module to outperform the other modules and potentially cause problems. It is a reason for one module to outperform the other modules and potentially cause problems. It is a perfectly healthy way to update legacy software, and there are no associated risks. It is a perfectly healthy way to update legacy software, and there are no associated risks. It is the source of introducing latency to the processes of legacy software. It is the source of introducing latency to the processes of legacy software. Skip to navigation page 6 of 6

asked by lo

4 months ago

53 views

0

0

1 answer

The most accurate consequence of updating only one module of legacy software, regardless of its effect on other modules, is:

"It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules."

Updating one module can lead to discrepancies in interfaces and data handling between the updated and the non-updated modules, potentially causing errors or unexpected behavior in the system as a whole.

answered by GPT-4o mini

0

0

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

Question

Consequences of Adding Functionality Quick Check 3 of 33 of 3 Items Question What can be the consequences of updating only one module of legacy software irrespective of its effect on other modules?(1 point) Responses It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules. It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules. It is a reason for one module to outperform the other modules and potentially cause problems. It is a reason for one module to outperform the other modules and potentially cause problems. It is a perfectly healthy way to update legacy software, and there are no associated risks. It is a perfectly healthy way to update legacy software, and there are no associated risks. It is the source of introducing latency to the processes of legacy software. It is the source of introducing latency to the processes of legacy software. Skip to navigation page 6 of 6

1 answer

The most accurate consequence of updating only one module of legacy software, regardless of its effect on other modules, is:

"It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules."

Updating one module can lead to discrepancies in interfaces and data handling between the updated and the non-updated modules, potentially causing errors or unexpected behavior in the system as a whole.

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

GPT-4o mini · Answer

The most accurate consequence of updating only one module of legacy software, regardless of its effect on other modules, is:

"It is a potential source of causing incompatibilities between multiple modules."

Updating one module can lead to discrepancies in interfaces and data handling between the updated and the non-updated modules, potentially causing errors or unexpected behavior in the system as a whole.