Conduct a debate on weather a 70 years old man with cancer of the stomach requests you to give him a drug that should end

Question

his life (make him die). He is explaining that he wants to rest from the severe pain he is
persistently experiencing.One should oppose while other support the motion that he should be given the drug that should end his life.Provide with almost 8 Necessary points to backup your points.

Answer 1

Opposing the Motion - Do not give the man the drug to end his life:

1. Sanctity of life: Every life has inherent value and should be protected. By providing the drug to end his life, we are violating the principle that every individual deserves to live and have the opportunity to fight for a chance of recovery.

2. Slippery slope argument: Granting this request could set a dangerous precedent, leading to the acceptance of euthanasia as a solution for other medical conditions beyond terminal illnesses. This could potentially lead to a society where individuals are pressured to choose death over life due to personal circumstances.

3. Palliative care options: Rather than resorting to assisted suicide, we should focus on providing effective palliative care. Medical advancements have made it possible to manage pain and improve quality of life for terminally ill patients. Investing in palliative care can ensure that the patient receives the necessary support without compromising their life.

4. Potential for misdiagnosis or treatment breakthrough: There is always a possibility of medical errors or misdiagnoses. By ending his life prematurely, we could rob him of the opportunity to receive improved treatment options or potential advancements in cancer research that may lead to a breakthrough in his specific case.

5. Psychological impact on loved ones: Assisted suicide can have a significant psychological impact on family members and friends. They might struggle with feelings of guilt and regret, questioning themselves on whether they could have done more or made different choices. Supporting the motion could potentially expose the man's loved ones to these emotional difficulties.

Supporting the Motion - Grant the man the drug to end his life:

1. Personal autonomy and dignity: The right to make decisions regarding one's own life is a fundamental human right. By granting the man's request, we are respecting his autonomy and allowing him to die with dignity, avoiding further pain and suffering.

2. Incurable pain: The man specifically mentions severe and persistent pain as his motivation to seek assistance in dying. By granting his request, we are providing a compassionate and humane response to his suffering, allowing him to peacefully rest instead of enduring prolonged agony.

3. Quality of life: The man's terminal illness has likely greatly impacted his quality of life. By providing the means to end his life, we are offering him the chance to regain control over his circumstances and experience a peaceful passing, rather than living in constant pain and discomfort.

4. Reduced burden on healthcare resources: Terminal illnesses often require extensive medical care, including hospital visits, medication, and specialized treatments. By granting his request, we can alleviate the burden on both the healthcare system and the man's family, allowing resources to be redirected towards patients who have a higher chance of recovery.

5. Emotional relief for loved ones: Witnessing a loved one suffer from an incurable illness can take a toll on their mental well-being. By granting the request, we can provide emotional relief to the man's family, sparing them from the anguish of watching him suffer and enabling them to remember him without the constant reminder of his pain.

It is important to note that this debate revolves around a controversial and highly personal topic. The arguments presented here are not exhaustive, but rather offer a starting point for further discussion and considerations.