Conduct a debate on a 70 years old man with cancer of the stomach requests you to give him a drug that should end

Question

his life (make him die). He is explaining that he wants to rest from the severe pain he is
persistently experiencing. Follow us through how you will handle his request
.One should oppose or support the motion that he should be given the drug that end his life or not.Provide with almost 8 Necessary points to backup your points.

Answer 1

Oppose: The 70-year-old man with stomach cancer should not be given a drug to end his life.

1) Preservation of life: The primary role of healthcare professionals is to preserve life, not end it. Assisting in the intentional ending of a life goes against the medical ethics and principles that prioritize the protection and preservation of life.

2) Potential for misdiagnosis: Diagnosing the severity and prognosis of cancer can be complex. Making the decision to end a life based solely on the patient's perception of severe pain may neglect the possibility of misdiagnosis or the potential for palliative care options to effectively relieve the pain in the future.

3) Palliative care alternatives: Palliative care focuses on maximizing the quality of life for patients facing serious illnesses, providing physical, emotional, and spiritual support. Instead of resorting to euthanasia, healthcare professionals should explore palliative care options that can address the patient's pain and improve their overall well-being.

4) Psychological support: Patients facing a terminal illness often experience depression, anxiety, and feelings of hopelessness. It is crucial to provide psychological support to help them cope with these emotional challenges rather than resorting to ending their life prematurely.

5) Slippery slope: If we allow the deliberate ending of a life due to severe pain, it opens the door to a slippery slope where other people may request euthanasia or assisted suicide for various reasons, potentially compromising the sanctity of human life.

6) Legal and ethical implications: In many countries, euthanasia or assisted suicide is illegal as it goes against the legal and ethical frameworks in place. Physicians could face legal repercussions, and healthcare systems may be subject to extensive scrutiny and controversy if they were to engage in such practices.

7) Focus on finding a cure: By investing in medical research and the development of new treatments, we can strive to find a cure for stomach cancer and other terminal, painful illnesses. Ending a patient's life prematurely deprives them of the opportunity to contribute to medical advancements or potentially benefit from a cure that may be discovered in the future.

8) Informed consent: It is essential to ensure that the patient fully understands the implications and consequences of their decision before proceeding with any end-of-life measures. Comprehensive discussions should take place, involving healthcare professionals, family members, and mental health experts, ensuring that the patient's decision is well-informed and reflects their true wishes.