Overall, it is clear that there are multiple perspectives and solutions to the problem of biodiversity loss due to the mall's construction. Each proposed solution has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, and it will be important for the community to carefully consider all options before making a decision.
Mr. Chavez's solution of not allowing construction may be seen as extreme by some, but it does prioritize the preservation of the land as a wildlife habitat. However, the costs and constraints of this solution may make it impractical for the community.
Dr. Lee's proposal of requiring the developers to purchase and preserve a section of habitat may be a more feasible option, as it allows for the construction of the mall while still mitigating the loss of biodiversity. However, there are still concerns about the effectiveness of this solution.
Mr. Roberson's idea of restoring developed lands to their natural states is noble, but the high costs and uncertainties surrounding the outcome may make it a less favorable option for the community.
Sophie's solution of implementing wildlife corridors may not be perfect, but it does offer a compromise between development and conservation. It is important for the community to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of each solution in order to determine the best course of action moving forward. By analyzing these solutions, the community can make an informed decision that balances the needs of both the environment and the community.
Comparing Design Solutions Portfolio
At the next community meeting, Sophie presents her solution to the problem of biodiversity loss due to the mall’s construction. A number of other people also have solutions and wish to talk about them.
Mr. Chavez has a much different solution for the problem. He thinks that the best solution is to not allow this construction at all. Instead, he thinks that the community should buy the land that is planned for construction and then commit to keeping it undeveloped. That land could be used only as a wildlife habitat. There aren’t many people at the meeting who agree with Mr. Chavez. One member points out that the costs or constraints involved in not building the mall would be too great. For example, people who want to shop may have to drive far if there isn’t another mall in the community. That means that more fuel will be used. That might not be the best choice for the environment.
Dr. Lee proposes a different solution. Let the developers build the mall, she argues. But in exchange, they must pledge to purchase and preserve a section of habitat that is similar in size to the one they are using to build the mall. This solution doesn’t have the same costs or constraints as not building the mall at all. But it still results in a loss of biodiversity.
Then Mr. Roberson proposes yet another solution. In exchange for building the mall, the developer must pay to restore lands that have been developed in the past to their previous natural states. If a developed area is no longer being used, then it may make sense to return it to its original ecosystem. Community members point out that Mr. Robinson’s proposal can be expensive to carry out. In fact, it can be far more expensive than developing the land in the first place. The developers may not agree to this plan, or they may insist that the community pay for part of the costs. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that it will be successful. What if the organisms that once called the area home don’t return?
Sophie believes that her design solution has an advantage over the others because it doesn’t have these costs and constraints. But when she presents it to her fellow community members, she realizes that wildlife corridors are a less perfect solution than she had previously believed. Community members point out that wildlife corridors can help to introduce new species to an ecosystem. These species may be invasive, or they may carry diseases that the native organisms may have difficulty fending off. But Sophie still believes that these costs are minimal if keystone and endangered species are saved.
At the end of the meeting, Dr. Lee makes a list of all of the potential solutions that community members have made. The list includes both the advantages and disadvantages of each solution. The citizens will take the time to analyze each potential solution to determine which is the best one.
5 answers
can you make it like a 7 grader wrote it pls
There are a lot of different ideas on how to deal with the biodiversity loss from building the mall. One person, Mr. Chavez, thinks we shouldn't build it at all and keep the land for wildlife. But that might not be practical because people need a mall for shopping and might have to drive further if there's no mall nearby. Dr. Lee suggests letting the developers build the mall but making them set aside land for wildlife. Mr. Roberson wants the developers to pay to restore other lands to their natural state. Sophie's idea is to create wildlife corridors to help animals move around. Each idea has good and bad points, so we need to think about them all before deciding what to do.
can you putt in 3 paragraph
There are a lot of different ideas on how to deal with the biodiversity loss from building the mall. One person, Mr. Chavez, thinks we shouldn't build it at all and keep the land for wildlife. But that might not be practical because people need a mall for shopping and might have to drive further if there's no mall nearby. Dr. Lee suggests letting the developers build the mall but making them set aside land for wildlife.
Mr. Roberson wants the developers to pay to restore other lands to their natural state. Sophie's idea is to create wildlife corridors to help animals move around. Each idea has good and bad points, so we need to think about them all before deciding what to do.
Mr. Roberson wants the developers to pay to restore other lands to their natural state. Sophie's idea is to create wildlife corridors to help animals move around. Each idea has good and bad points, so we need to think about them all before deciding what to do.
1 answer