Compare the two claims above. How do these claims differ from one another?

Question

A. Claim 1 takes an affirmative position toward genetically modified foods, while Claim 2 takes a negative position. B. Claim 1 establishes an informal, conversational style through the use of contractions and point of view. C. Claim 1 relies solely on anecdotal evidence, while Claim 2 uses a wider range of supporting evidence. D. Claim 1 establishes a formal, academic style through the use of complex syntax and advanced vocabulary.
Passage:
• Claim 1: If you have ever eaten anything that has grown in the ground, you've almost certainly eaten genetically modified organisms. Genetic engineering has been integral to the human diet for thousands of years, and it's given us a wider and better variety of foods. Adapting this technology on a wider scale will allow that very positive trend to continue.

• Claim 2: Over 2,000 scientific studies performed worldwide have shown that genetically modified crops are safe and that they have the potential to enrich the human diet nutritionally, lower the price of food, and end food insecurity in a world where the growing population continues to place a strain on resources.

Answer 1

The claims differ primarily in their approach and supporting evidence.

A. Claim 1 takes an affirmative position toward genetically modified foods, while Claim 2 takes a negative position. This statement is incorrect. Both claims appear to take a positive stance on genetically modified foods.

B. Claim 1 establishes an informal, conversational style through the use of contractions and point of view. This statement is somewhat accurate, as Claim 1 employs a more personal tone by addressing the reader directly. However, the specific use of contractions isn't evident and isn’t a primary differentiating factor.

C. Claim 1 relies solely on anecdotal evidence, while Claim 2 uses a wider range of supporting evidence. This statement is correct. Claim 1 relies more on general observations about the nature of eating and genetic engineering as part of the human diet, which could be considered anecdotal. In contrast, Claim 2 presents the findings of over 2,000 scientific studies as evidence, making it more robust.

D. Claim 1 establishes a formal, academic style through the use of complex syntax and advanced vocabulary. This statement is incorrect. Claim 1 has a more informal tone, while Claim 2 uses a more formal approach with references to scientific studies.

In summary, the most accurate option highlighting the difference between the two claims is C. Claim 1 relies solely on anecdotal evidence, while Claim 2 uses a wider range of supporting evidence.