The two claims differ primarily in their position toward genetically modified foods. Claim 1 takes an affirmative position, supporting the use of genetically modified foods, while Claim 2 takes a negative stance, opposing them. This contrast in viewpoints highlights the differing perspectives on the topic, which influences the tone and style of each claim.
Compare the two claims above. How do these claims differ from one another?
(1 point)
Claim 1 establishes an informal, conversational style through the use of contractions and point of view.
Claim 1 relies solely on anecdotal evidence, while Claim 2 uses a wider range of supporting evidence.
Claim 1 takes an affirmative position toward genetically modified foods, while Claim 2 takes a negative position.
Claim 1 establishes a formal, academic style through the use of complex syntax and advanced vocabulary.
1 answer
1 answer