Question
compare the student text with the source
Source: anyone who has experienced firsthand the overwhelming power of the life-size painted bulls and horses in the cave of southern western France will understand at once that the creators must have been as modern in their minds as they were on their skeletons
Student text: If you’ve seen the ancient paintings in France’s Lascaux Cave, then you know that their creators must have been as modern in their minds as they were in their skeletons
Is the students text plagiarized? Why or why not?
Source: anyone who has experienced firsthand the overwhelming power of the life-size painted bulls and horses in the cave of southern western France will understand at once that the creators must have been as modern in their minds as they were on their skeletons
Student text: If you’ve seen the ancient paintings in France’s Lascaux Cave, then you know that their creators must have been as modern in their minds as they were in their skeletons
Is the students text plagiarized? Why or why not?
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The student's text does not appear to be directly plagiarized, but it does closely paraphrase the source material. Here are the reasons for this assessment:
1. **Close Similarity in Structure and Content**: The student text maintains much of the same structure and meaning as the source. Phrases like "ancient paintings in France’s Lascaux Cave" closely mirror the original mention of "life-size painted bulls and horses in the cave of southern western France."
2. **Lack of Quotation Marks or Citation**: The student text does not use quotation marks to indicate that it is directly referencing the source material and also does not provide a citation. This omission can create confusion about the originality of the student's writing.
3. **Rephrasing**: While the student does rephrase the text (e.g., using "know that their creators must have been" instead of "will understand at once that the creators must have been"), the overall resemblance in thought and expression remains strong.
To avoid plagiarism, the student should ensure that they either quote the source directly with appropriate citation or significantly restructure the ideas and language to make it distinct from the original while still crediting the source of the inspiration.
1. **Close Similarity in Structure and Content**: The student text maintains much of the same structure and meaning as the source. Phrases like "ancient paintings in France’s Lascaux Cave" closely mirror the original mention of "life-size painted bulls and horses in the cave of southern western France."
2. **Lack of Quotation Marks or Citation**: The student text does not use quotation marks to indicate that it is directly referencing the source material and also does not provide a citation. This omission can create confusion about the originality of the student's writing.
3. **Rephrasing**: While the student does rephrase the text (e.g., using "know that their creators must have been" instead of "will understand at once that the creators must have been"), the overall resemblance in thought and expression remains strong.
To avoid plagiarism, the student should ensure that they either quote the source directly with appropriate citation or significantly restructure the ideas and language to make it distinct from the original while still crediting the source of the inspiration.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.