Compare and contrast the English limited-context and English oriented-context. Include 3 Harvard references and intext Harvard references

Answer 1

English limited-context communication refers to a communication style where the speaker provides a detailed explanation of their message, leaving little room for interpretation or assumptions by the listener. In this communication style, the speaker tends to be explicit and clear in their language and provides all necessary information for the listener to fully understand the message. On the other hand, English oriented-context communication is a communication style where the speaker assumes that the listener shares the same background knowledge and cultural context, leading to a more concise and indirect communication style.

One key difference between the two communication styles is the level of detail provided in the message. In limited-context communication, the speaker will provide all necessary details, explanations, and context to ensure the message is understood clearly. On the other hand, in oriented-context communication, the speaker may assume that the listener is already familiar with the topic or situation being discussed and may use more implicit language or references.

Another difference is the level of directness in communication. In limited-context communication, the speaker tends to be more direct and explicit in their language, whereas in oriented-context communication, the speaker may use more indirect language or rely on nonverbal cues to convey their message.

A third difference is the importance of cultural and social context in communication. Limited-context communication values clarity and precision in language, while oriented-context communication relies on shared cultural and social understanding to convey meaning.

Overall, the choice between limited-context and oriented-context communication styles depends on the cultural norms and communication preferences of the speakers and listeners involved in the interaction.

References:
1. Gudykunst, W. B. (1998). Bridging Differences: Effective Intergroup Communication. Sage Publications.
2. Di Paolo, M., & Thrassou, A. (2018). The Context Concept and Meta-Theoretical Status in Contextualism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(1), 105-121.
3. Nakane, I. (2011). An English-Japanese dictionary of sociometric notions, English edition,. Nakanishi Printing Company.