Selective breeding involves breeding organisms with desired traits over many generations, resulting in a natural process of genetic variation. This method allows for the preservation of genetic diversity and can be done using traditional methods. However, it can be time-consuming and may not always achieve the desired results quickly.
On the other hand, genetic modification involves directly altering an organism's DNA to add or remove specific traits. This method can produce quicker and more precise results, but may also have unknown long-term effects on the environment and human health.
A person might choose to use selective breeding over genetic modification if they value the preservation of natural genetic diversity and are willing to invest the time and effort required for the process. Conversely, a person might choose to create a GMO over a selectively bred organism if they are looking for quicker and more targeted results, or if they believe that the benefits of genetic modification outweigh the potential risks.
Compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of selective breeding versus genetic modification. Why might a person choose to use selective breeding over genetic modification? Why might a person choose to create a GMO over a selectively bred organism? Use three to five sentences to formulate your argument. Write like your a 7th grader.
3 answers
shorten it
Selective breeding involves breeding organisms to create desired traits over time, preserving genetic diversity but taking longer to achieve results. Genetic modification directly alters an organism's DNA for quicker and more precise changes, but with potential unknown long-term effects. A person might choose selective breeding for natural diversity and patience, while opting for genetic modification for faster and targeted results or perceived benefits outweighing risks.
1 answer