Claire says that in order to calculate the surface area of the cone, she needs to use 8 in. Miles says that in order to calculate the surface area of the cone, he needs to use 9 in. Who is correct and why?(1 point)ResponsesMiles is correct because 9 in. is the height of the cone.Miles is correct because 9 in. is the height of the cone.Claire is correct because 8 in. is the height of the cone.Claire is correct because 8 in. is the height of the cone.Miles is correct because 9 in. is the slant height of the cone.Miles is correct because 9 in. is the slant height of the cone.Claire is correct because 8 in. is the slant height of the cone. ( 8 is the height 9 is the slant height and 7 is the diamiter)

1 answer

To determine who is correct regarding the dimensions for calculating the surface area of the cone, we need to clarify the different dimensions involved in the calculation.

The surface area \( A \) of a cone is calculated using the formula:

\[ A = \pi r(r + l) \]

where:

  • \( r \) is the radius of the base of the cone,
  • \( l \) is the slant height of the cone.

From your information, it looks like:

  • 8 in. is the height of the cone,
  • 9 in. is the slant height of the cone,
  • It seems to imply that the diameter is 7 in., which means the radius \( r = \frac{7}{2} = 3.5 \) in.

Based on the options given:

  • If Claire is using 8 in. as the height, it is indeed the height and not necessary for calculating surface area directly.
  • If Miles is using 9 in. as the slant height, then he is correct in that context for calculating the surface area.

So, the correct statement would be: Miles is correct because 9 in. is the slant height of the cone.