Claim: people have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls on election day

Evidence: People can cast their ballot early or by mail

In one to two sentences, evaluate the relevance sufficiency of the evidence in the argument above the determine if the claim is or is not convincing

1 answer

The evidence provided is relevant to the claim as it presents two viable options for individuals who cannot physically go to the polls on election day. However, the evidence may not be sufficient as it does not address all potential voting options, such as absentee voting or voting at designated locations on election day. Overall, the evidence partially supports the claim but may not be entirely convincing on its own.
Similar Questions
  1. HII Use the claim and evidence to complete the activity.Claim: People have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls
    1. answers icon 5 answers
    1. answers icon 7 answers
    1. answers icon 16 answers
  2. What is a common criticism of election polling?(1 point)Responses There are not enough polls conducted during campaigns. There
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions