Claim: people have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls on election day
Evidence: People can cast their ballot early or by mail
In one to two sentences, evaluate the relevance sufficiency of the evidence in the argument above the determine if the claim is or is not convincing
1 answer
The evidence provided is relevant to the claim as it presents two viable options for individuals who cannot physically go to the polls on election day. However, the evidence may not be sufficient as it does not address all potential voting options, such as absentee voting or voting at designated locations on election day. Overall, the evidence partially supports the claim but may not be entirely convincing on its own.