Claim: People have many voting options if they can’t get to the polls on Election Day.

Question

Evidence: People can cast their ballot early or by mail.

In 1–2 sentences, evaluate the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence in the argument above to determine if the claim is or is not convincing.

(2 points)

Answer 1

The evidence provided is relevant as it highlights alternative voting options for those who cannot make it to the polls on Election Day. However, the evidence is not sufficient on its own to fully support the claim as it does not address other potential barriers to voting or the effectiveness of these alternative options.

Answer 2

make it shorter

Answer 3

The evidence provided is relevant as it offers alternative voting options for those unable to vote on Election Day, but it is not sufficient to fully support the claim as it does not address potential barriers or evaluate the effectiveness of these alternatives.