The statement "Nearly 90% of mail is junk mail and throwing it away is bad for the environment" is NOT a good piece of evidence to support the claim that we still need a post office. This statement focuses on the negative aspects of junk mail rather than providing a reason for the continued necessity of the post office. In contrast, the other two pieces of evidence directly support the claim by highlighting the post office's role in package delivery and its service to Americans across the country.
Claim: In the United States, we still need a post office. Which of the following is NOT a good piece of evidence to support this claim?
*
1 point
The post office is needed for the delivery of packages.
Nearly 90% of mail is junk mail and throwing it away is bad for the environment.
The post office serves Americans throughout the country
1 answer