Question

citizens united vs federal elections commission summary/background information and ruiling/outcome in 2-3 sentences

Answer 1

In the landmark case *Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission* (2010), the Supreme Court ruled that the government cannot restrict independent political expenditures by corporations and unions, asserting that such spending is a form of protected free speech under the First Amendment. The decision invalidated key provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, significantly altering the landscape of campaign finance by allowing unlimited spending to influence elections. This ruling led to the rise of Super PACs and increased the influence of money in politics.