To determine the best combination of statements, let's analyze each one:
A. Correct. This statement accurately describes the purpose of a sequestration order in insolvency law.
B. Correct. 'Becoming insolvent' does indeed have a broader meaning than 'being sequestrated,' as insolvency can refer to a broader range of situations where debts cannot be paid, while sequestration specifically refers to legal proceedings to manage those debts.
C. Correct. A sequestration order differs from ordinary judgments where a creditor can execute against a debtor's assets.
D. This statement may be outdated or factually incorrect, as fines for trustees can vary and may not be limited to R500.
E. Correct. After the winding-up process, the company is officially dissolved, and this is recorded and published.
Based on the correctness of the statements:
- Statements A, B, C, and E are correct.
- Statement D is questionable regarding its accuracy.
Thus, the best combination of correct statements would be Statements B, C, and E are correct.