check this

One feature of a flower that is trying to attract the hummingbird moth is the strong, sweet odor it produces. The strong odor attracts the hummingbird moth to go near it and pollinate it. I think the flower would be reproductively successful if it adapted to the needs of more than one pollinator. If the flower has multiple pollinators, they would be more successful in reproduction since different birds would come and pollinate it at different times, therefore it would be more successful in reproduction.

5 answers

Your description of the flower's adaptation to attract hummingbird moths is clear, and you've made a good point about the benefits of having multiple pollinators for reproductive success. Here are a few suggestions to improve clarity and depth in your explanation:

  1. Clarify the Pollination Relationship: It might be helpful to explain why the strong, sweet odor specifically attracts hummingbird moths. You could mention that they are drawn to the scent because they feed on nectar, and this enhances the chances of successful pollination.

  2. Expand on Reproductive Success: When you speculate that a flower would be more reproductively successful with multiple pollinators, consider discussing how this could lead to broader genetic diversity in the plant population. Genetic diversity can make populations more resilient to diseases and changing environmental conditions.

  3. Provide Examples: Mention specific examples of flowers that attract various pollinators. For instance, some flowers attract not only hummingbird moths but also bees or butterflies, illustrating your point about adaptability.

Here’s a revised version incorporating these suggestions:


One feature of a flower that attracts the hummingbird moth is the strong, sweet odor it produces. This scent draws the hummingbird moths, which feed on nectar, leading them to pollinate the flower. I believe that the flower would increase its reproductive success by adapting to attract more than one type of pollinator.

By being appealing to various pollinators, such as bees or butterflies in addition to hummingbird moths, the flower could enhance its chances of reproduction. Different pollinators may be active at different times or in varying environmental conditions, leading to more frequent and effective pollination. Additionally, this strategy could promote greater genetic diversity within the plant population, which might help them adapt to diseases and environmental changes.

Overall, multi-pollinator attraction could significantly enhance a flower's reproductive success.


Feel free to adjust any part of the response to better fit your style or focus!

any grammical errors?

Your original passage has a few grammatical and stylistic issues that could be improved. Here are some suggested corrections:

  1. Sentence Structure: The sentence "The strong odor attracts the hummingbird moth to go near it and pollinate it." could be streamlined for clarity. Consider rephrasing it to something like: "The strong odor attracts the hummingbird moth, encouraging it to approach the flower and pollinate it."

  2. Redundancy: In the phrase "therefore it would be more successful in reproduction," consider removing "in reproduction" since it's already implied. You could say, "therefore it would be more successful."

  3. Punctuation and Flow: You have a long sentence that might benefit from being split for better readability. For example, you could separate the following: "If the flower has multiple pollinators, they would be more successful in reproduction since different birds would come and pollinate it at different times." This can be made clearer by rephrasing: "If the flower has multiple pollinators, it would increase its chances of successful reproduction. Different pollinators may be active at different times, ensuring ongoing pollination."

Here is a revised version with these corrections in mind:


One feature of a flower that attracts hummingbird moths is the strong, sweet odor it produces. This strong odor draws the hummingbird moth, encouraging it to approach the flower and pollinate it. I believe the flower would be reproductively successful if it adapted to the needs of more than one pollinator. With multiple pollinators, the flower would increase its chances of successful reproduction, as different pollinators might visit at different times.


This revision improves grammatical accuracy and enhances clarity and readability. If you have any specific concerns about certain phrases or sentences, feel free to ask!

One feature of a flower that is trying to attract the hummingbird moth is the strong, sweet odor it produces. The strong odor attracts the hummingbird moth to approach and pollinate it. I think the flower would be reproductively successful if it adapted to the needs of more than one pollinator. If the flower has multiple pollinators, they would be more successful in reproduction. Different birds would come and pollinate it at different times, therefore it would be more successful.

hows this

Your revised passage is much clearer and more concise! However, I see a few areas for improvement in terms of clarity, flow, and grammatical accuracy. Here’s a polished version with some suggestions:


One feature of a flower that attracts the hummingbird moth is the strong, sweet odor it produces. This strong scent encourages the hummingbird moth to approach and pollinate the flower. I believe the flower would be more reproductively successful if it adapted to the needs of multiple pollinators.

By attracting various pollinators, the flower can increase its chances of successful reproduction, as different pollinators may come at different times. This diversity in visitors would enhance its overall reproductive success.


Key Edits and Improvements:

  1. Streamlined Phrasing: I changed "that is trying to attract" to "that attracts" for conciseness.
  2. Clarity in Expression: I replaced "therefore it would be more successful" with "This diversity in visitors would enhance its overall reproductive success" to make the rationale clearer.
  3. Grammar & Flow: I ensured that the sentences flowed logically from one idea to the next, grouping thoughts together in a way that makes the progression more natural.

This version maintains your original meaning while enhancing clarity and readability. If you have any other questions or need further adjustments, feel free to ask!