Category 4: Evaluate the Overall Effectiveness/Impact of each speech (2 +2 = 4) + (2 +2= 4) = (8 marks)

Question

Speech 1: Dananjaya Hettiarachchi Speech 2: Mohammed Qahtani
Category 3: Overall Effectiveness/Impact of Each Address (20 marks)
Most Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
Most Appealing Aspects and Reasons:

Least Appealing Aspects and Reasons:
Least Appealing Aspects and Reasons:

Answer 1

Speech 1: Dananjaya Hettiarachchi
Most Appealing Aspects:
1) Engaging storytelling: Hettiarachchi's speech was captivating due to his ability to weave personal anecdotes and stories that resonated with the audience. This helped to keep the audience engaged and interested in the message he was conveying.
2) Emotional connection: The speech was able to evoke strong emotions in the audience, as Hettiarachchi shared personal struggles and triumphs. This created a powerful connection between the speaker and the listeners, making the speech impactful.

Least Appealing Aspects:
1) Lack of structure: Hettiarachchi's speech lacked a clear structure, which made it difficult to follow at times. This could have been improved by organizing his points more logically and providing clearer transitions between ideas.
2) Limited use of visuals: The speech relied heavily on verbal storytelling, with minimal use of visual aids. This may have made it harder for the audience to fully grasp and remember the key messages of the speech.

Speech 2: Mohammed Qahtani
Most Appealing Aspects:
1) Clear and concise delivery: Qahtani's speech was highly effective due to his precise delivery. He effectively communicated his ideas and points without unnecessary repetition or verbosity, making it easier for the audience to understand.
2) Use of humor: Qahtani incorporated humor into his speech, which helped to engage the audience and create a positive and enjoyable atmosphere. This made his message more memorable and relatable.

Least Appealing Aspects:
1) Lack of personal connection: Unlike Hettiarachchi's speech, Qahtani's speech lacked personal anecdotes or stories that could have created a stronger emotional connection with the audience. This made the speech less impactful in terms of connecting with the listeners on a deeper level.
2) Limited use of visual aids: Similar to Hettiarachchi's speech, Qahtani's speech relied primarily on verbal delivery without much use of visual aids. This could have been enhanced by incorporating more visual elements to support and reinforce his points.