To determine which equation accurately models the height of the baseball in terms of its horizontal distance, we can analyze each option. In general, the shape of a baseball's trajectory is a downward-opening parabola, which suggests the height function should have a negative leading coefficient.
Let’s examine the options:
-
h(x) = 43 1920 (2-90)² + 215
This equation seems to have a formatting issue and isn’t clearly defined. It does not show a traditional quadratic structure because it’s not clear what "43 1920" means. -
h(x) = 43/(1, 620) * (x - 90)² + 215
This function has a positive leading coefficient, suggesting that it opens upwards, which is not characteristic of a projectile’s height function. Thus, it cannot represent the height of a ball in flight. -
h(x) = -18/(9, 245) * (x - 215)² + 90
This equation has a negative coefficient, which suggests that it opens downwards (correct for a projectile). This looks like a reasonable choice, but we need clarification on the specific value (the numbers in the denominator "9, 245") and what they represent in context. -
h(x) = 18/(9, 245) * (x - 215)² + 90
Similar to option 2, this has a positive leading coefficient. Therefore, it cannot correctly represent the parabola's shape for a home run ball.
Given these assessments, the most reasonable function that models the height of the ball is:
h(x) = -18/(9, 245) * (x - 215)² + 90
This function represents a downward-opening parabola, conforming to what is expected from a trajectory of a baseball hit as a home run.
Please verify the coefficients and constants based on the specific context of the game to ensure accuracy in modeling.