Yes. If an object is not moving relative to you and I am moving relative to you, then relative to me, the object will be moving. The laws of physics are the same for all non-accelerating observers.
When defining what we mean by "equilibrium", you will want that definition to be independent of the observer. You don't want to define "equilibrium" such that according to you an object can be in equilibrium but according to me it isn't just because I'm moving relative to the object.
Can someone please answer this for me, thanks:
Can an object be moving and still be in equilibrium? Explain.
2 answers
what is mean about forces acting on a book if we state that the book is in a state of equilibrium
1 answer