You have to take these major assignments one step at a time. Numbering them for yourself will help you remember that. In the list below, I numbered them, but reversed the 4th and 5th steps from what you were given.
----------------------
1. In the unit review, you wrote a statement in which you explained whether you considered government under the Roman republic or government under the Roman empire to be more successful, and why.
So ... in the unit review, what statement did you write?
2. Elaborate on that statement by writing an essay in which you evaluate the successes of the Roman republic and the Roman Empire.
Now you need to repeat that statement and give lots of examples and evidence (see #4 below).
3. Provide at least two ways in which you consider each type of government to have been successful and two ways in which you consider each to have been unsuccessful.
This is self-explanatory for what to include in step 2.
4. Be sure to explain your reasoning with evidence/examples from the unit and from your World History online textbook.
Use the examples and details to support your stance from the unit and your textbook. Clearly, your teacher doesn't want you using anything from the Internet (such as search results from Google or Bing).
5. In your conclusion, propose one change for both the republic and empire, which would have fixed the problems of Roman society
This is self-explanatory.
Can anyone PLSS help me with an essay, I am failing world history and I am trying to get all my missing assignments in but this one essay I just cannot get started on I've written it about 5 times and I don't think they are good enough to submit.
In the unit review, you wrote a statement in which you explained whether you considered government under the Roman republic or government under the Roman empire to be more successful, and why.
Elaborate on that statement by writing an essay in which you evaluate the successes of the Roman republic and the Roman Empire.
Provide at least two ways in which you consider each type of government to have been successful and two ways in which you consider each to have been unsuccessful.
In your conclusion, propose one change for both the republic and empire, which would have fixed the problems of Roman society
Be sure to explain your reasoning with evidence/examples from the unit and from your World History online textbook.
5 answers
what are the 2 successes of both the roman govt and 2 ways they were unsuccessful?
answer..... btw use the website word tune on every open response answer you find... you can re-word it and act like it's your answer.... here's the answer. (USE WORDTUNE OR YOU"LL GET IT WRONG)
Both the Roman Empire and the roman republic had periods of instability that definitely caused their demise. They all lasted for the same amount of time. it will be difficult to ascertain which one is more successful than the other. roman republic came into conflict with the Phoenicians after it controlled the Italian peninsula, which spread to the Mediterranean. roman won in the three punic wars and those who fought in the war were forced to abandon their farms and homes which were in disrepair and the cost had been expensive. The republic ruled for short time by a triumvirate whereby sooner they collapsed and the empire did not last more than the republic but their territorial gains were considered extensive while the republic limited itself to the Mediterranean and peninsula.
Both the Roman Empire and the roman republic had periods of instability that definitely caused their demise. They all lasted for the same amount of time. it will be difficult to ascertain which one is more successful than the other. roman republic came into conflict with the Phoenicians after it controlled the Italian peninsula, which spread to the Mediterranean. roman won in the three punic wars and those who fought in the war were forced to abandon their farms and homes which were in disrepair and the cost had been expensive. The republic ruled for short time by a triumvirate whereby sooner they collapsed and the empire did not last more than the republic but their territorial gains were considered extensive while the republic limited itself to the Mediterranean and peninsula.
I have not taken the course but I will provide my understanding of Roman History to have some ideas.
The Latins who lived in the area around the modern region of Latium were a Kingdom since the time of their first king, Romulus. There were in total, 10 of these kings that controlled this small area under the name of their kingdom "The Kingdom of Rome". After this, a man named Brutus came and established a Republic making the Senate supreme in all matters. Its system of governance is based on the idea that not one man should hold too much power. Thus, Consuls were introduced that held Fasces or command of the Senate every other month for a year. Then new Consuls would be elected. This begins with my first major pro for the Republic, the reason the state lasted for so long was that they did an amazing job at making the game at kingdom maker so difficult to pull off. If any man wanted to become king, they would be met with the entire Senate to oppose them, and because the system they created based itself on that fact of the balance of power, the Consuls never could be Consul for so long that they would be able to gain kingship status. Another is that it encouraged conquest. The reason the Romans lasted as an Empire for so long was because of the early days. Men like Hannibal and Mithratates and Pyrrhus all fought to destroy Rome but the will to conquer and not give in is what led them to such glory. Hannibal often said that Roma did not know when to quit, but this will to continue is what made Rome unbeatable. Its downfall, however, was because of its strength. Pompey Magnus had sided with Sulla, Sulla was a general, statesman, and charismatic leader, not too far off from his later predecessor Gaius Julius Caesar. Sulla defeated the Gaulic tribes, and Numidia in Africa and had become famous. He was a rabble-rouser who made the public his ally, something that the Braachus Brothers did around the same time. Pompey would not do this, yet his support as Sulla's ally and trusted lieutenant made Pompey powerful in his own right. Later Pompey would fight Mithridates VI of Pontus and would conquer much of Asia minor if not client state other nations in the region. Then there was Julius Caesar, the adoptive father of Octavianus or Octavian who would later become the first Emperor of Rome. Caesar was a man of a famous dynasty, the Julii Caesares. He was the man who conquered parts of Hispaniola and almost all of Gaul. He defeated Pompey in the 3rd Civil War and drove Roman politics to make men kill him for his overreach of power. Brutus was the head of this Conspiracy in part because he was the direct ancestor of the man that ended the Monarchy. Marc Anthony, Lepidus, and Octavianus (Octavianus is now known to the Romans as Julius Caesar because Julius Caesar prior had named Octavianus heir) all opposed the killing of Julius Caesar in the senate house and their would be a 4th Civil War cumulating in the battles of Pharsalus where Marc Anthony and Octavianus won. Long story short, these two men would fight their own wars with Octavianus fighting the son of Pompey Magnus, and Marc Anthony fighting the Parthians. These two men would then fight each other which lead to complete disaster for Marc Anthony in the naval battle of Actium. He would later die leaving Octavianus to transform Rome into a true Empire with him as Emperor (where he would use his much more famous name of Augustus). Clearly, the two problems with the Republic were with the downfall itself. First, people were too afraid of change that Civil Wars happened when anyone tried to change something. They had huge corruption with more and more of the government being used by political alliances to do what they wanted. The 1st Triumphorant and the 2nd were Oligarthic systems in their very nature, and with the Senate having fewer important members, it became more of who was on who's side.
The Empire was founded by Augustus or Octavianus. Its main strength was its unity and prosperity. Conquest was over, for the most part, only Trajan would ever conquer great parts of the land. The Empire focused on domestic affairs and culture and money was everywhere. Gladiators and Chariot racing were popular, and this alone made life in the Pax Romana a great time. For the most part, the fact that conquest wasn't the main aim was why Emperors were able to focus on helping the people to make themselves more popular. So we have the fact that they were not warlike as a plus, and the fact that they focused on making life great as a plus. Yet the problem was people wanting to be top dog. In the years towards the end of the Empire. However, in the year 69, there were 4 Emperors in control of 4 areas of the Empire, Vespasian won this Civil War and the house under Julius Caesar never again held this much power over Rome. With the fact that the Emperors in the future of 69 were not relatives of Gaius Julius Caesar may have made some sort of long-term succession crisis. The fact that greed of the Emperors and the lavishness of their lifestyles drained the Roman coffers. In times of war, coinage like the Denarius was debased making its monetary value worthless (although today the denarius is worth about 30 to 50 bucks). So the Empire fell because of greed, and because of failed governance. Making the Empire fall to the Ottomans in 1453 making the Roman state live for about 2205 years.
The Latins who lived in the area around the modern region of Latium were a Kingdom since the time of their first king, Romulus. There were in total, 10 of these kings that controlled this small area under the name of their kingdom "The Kingdom of Rome". After this, a man named Brutus came and established a Republic making the Senate supreme in all matters. Its system of governance is based on the idea that not one man should hold too much power. Thus, Consuls were introduced that held Fasces or command of the Senate every other month for a year. Then new Consuls would be elected. This begins with my first major pro for the Republic, the reason the state lasted for so long was that they did an amazing job at making the game at kingdom maker so difficult to pull off. If any man wanted to become king, they would be met with the entire Senate to oppose them, and because the system they created based itself on that fact of the balance of power, the Consuls never could be Consul for so long that they would be able to gain kingship status. Another is that it encouraged conquest. The reason the Romans lasted as an Empire for so long was because of the early days. Men like Hannibal and Mithratates and Pyrrhus all fought to destroy Rome but the will to conquer and not give in is what led them to such glory. Hannibal often said that Roma did not know when to quit, but this will to continue is what made Rome unbeatable. Its downfall, however, was because of its strength. Pompey Magnus had sided with Sulla, Sulla was a general, statesman, and charismatic leader, not too far off from his later predecessor Gaius Julius Caesar. Sulla defeated the Gaulic tribes, and Numidia in Africa and had become famous. He was a rabble-rouser who made the public his ally, something that the Braachus Brothers did around the same time. Pompey would not do this, yet his support as Sulla's ally and trusted lieutenant made Pompey powerful in his own right. Later Pompey would fight Mithridates VI of Pontus and would conquer much of Asia minor if not client state other nations in the region. Then there was Julius Caesar, the adoptive father of Octavianus or Octavian who would later become the first Emperor of Rome. Caesar was a man of a famous dynasty, the Julii Caesares. He was the man who conquered parts of Hispaniola and almost all of Gaul. He defeated Pompey in the 3rd Civil War and drove Roman politics to make men kill him for his overreach of power. Brutus was the head of this Conspiracy in part because he was the direct ancestor of the man that ended the Monarchy. Marc Anthony, Lepidus, and Octavianus (Octavianus is now known to the Romans as Julius Caesar because Julius Caesar prior had named Octavianus heir) all opposed the killing of Julius Caesar in the senate house and their would be a 4th Civil War cumulating in the battles of Pharsalus where Marc Anthony and Octavianus won. Long story short, these two men would fight their own wars with Octavianus fighting the son of Pompey Magnus, and Marc Anthony fighting the Parthians. These two men would then fight each other which lead to complete disaster for Marc Anthony in the naval battle of Actium. He would later die leaving Octavianus to transform Rome into a true Empire with him as Emperor (where he would use his much more famous name of Augustus). Clearly, the two problems with the Republic were with the downfall itself. First, people were too afraid of change that Civil Wars happened when anyone tried to change something. They had huge corruption with more and more of the government being used by political alliances to do what they wanted. The 1st Triumphorant and the 2nd were Oligarthic systems in their very nature, and with the Senate having fewer important members, it became more of who was on who's side.
The Empire was founded by Augustus or Octavianus. Its main strength was its unity and prosperity. Conquest was over, for the most part, only Trajan would ever conquer great parts of the land. The Empire focused on domestic affairs and culture and money was everywhere. Gladiators and Chariot racing were popular, and this alone made life in the Pax Romana a great time. For the most part, the fact that conquest wasn't the main aim was why Emperors were able to focus on helping the people to make themselves more popular. So we have the fact that they were not warlike as a plus, and the fact that they focused on making life great as a plus. Yet the problem was people wanting to be top dog. In the years towards the end of the Empire. However, in the year 69, there were 4 Emperors in control of 4 areas of the Empire, Vespasian won this Civil War and the house under Julius Caesar never again held this much power over Rome. With the fact that the Emperors in the future of 69 were not relatives of Gaius Julius Caesar may have made some sort of long-term succession crisis. The fact that greed of the Emperors and the lavishness of their lifestyles drained the Roman coffers. In times of war, coinage like the Denarius was debased making its monetary value worthless (although today the denarius is worth about 30 to 50 bucks). So the Empire fell because of greed, and because of failed governance. Making the Empire fall to the Ottomans in 1453 making the Roman state live for about 2205 years.
wordtune is the best thank you #brainly
5 answers