But just because scientists may be able to bring species back doesn’t mean they should. Two scientists debate the ethics of de-extinction.

Examine the author's word choice at the end of section #1. Which position does the author seem to show bias toward? In other words, which position does the author seem to agree with?(1 point)
Responses

We should bring back extinct species.
We should bring back extinct species.

We should not bring back extinct species.

3 answers

We should not bring back extinct species.
can you explain why
The author's word choice at the end of section #1 ("doesn't mean they should") implies a cautionary position or hesitation towards the idea of bringing back extinct species. This suggests that the author is more inclined to agree with the position that we should not bring back extinct species. The use of the word "should not" instead of "should" indicates the author's bias against de-extinction.
Similar Questions
  1. Should We Bring Back Extinct Species?Section #1 The idea of bringing extinct species back to life is known as
    1. answers icon 0 answers
  2. Should We Bring Back Extinct Species?Section #1 The idea of bringing extinct species back to life is known as
    1. answers icon 0 answers
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. INTRODUCTION Essay Paragraph 1:HOOK: Did you know that scientists are currently exploring the possibility of bringing back
    1. answers icon 5 answers
more similar questions