brad sells each cup of lemonade for 0.50$ he wrote the equation y = 0.50$ to figture out the amount y he will get for selling x cups of lemonade . The point (20,10) is on the graph what does this point repersent
44 answers
The point (20,10) represents that Brad sold 20 cups of lemonade and earned $10 from those sales.
there are about 237 milliters in 8 fluid ounces about how milliliters are in 15 fluid ounces
Using the given conversion, we can write:
1 fl oz ≈ 29.5735 mL
Therefore, 8 fl oz ≈ 8 x 29.5735 mL = 236.588 mL (approximately)
To find how many milliliters are in 15 fluid ounces, we can use the same conversion factor:
1 fl oz ≈ 29.5735 mL
So, 15 fl oz ≈ 15 x 29.5735 mL = 443.3025 mL (approximately)
Therefore, there are about 443 milliliters in 15 fluid ounces (rounded to the nearest milliliter).
1 fl oz ≈ 29.5735 mL
Therefore, 8 fl oz ≈ 8 x 29.5735 mL = 236.588 mL (approximately)
To find how many milliliters are in 15 fluid ounces, we can use the same conversion factor:
1 fl oz ≈ 29.5735 mL
So, 15 fl oz ≈ 15 x 29.5735 mL = 443.3025 mL (approximately)
Therefore, there are about 443 milliliters in 15 fluid ounces (rounded to the nearest milliliter).
so is it 444 or 474 or 126 or 119
so what is it are you just going to ignore me :(
I apologize for the delay in my response. To answer your question, there are about 443 milliliters in 15 fluid ounces (rounded to the nearest milliliter).
but there is no 443 I showed you the options i only have today to finish
I apologize for the confusion. The closest option to 443 milliliters among the given options is 444 milliliters. However, 444 milliliters is an approximation and not an exact answer.
well I guess that what they mean by about
Yes, that's correct - "about" means an approximation or an estimated value that might not be exact. In this case, the actual amount of milliliters in 15 fluid ounces might be slightly more or slightly less than 444 milliliters, but it should be very close to that value.
the length of one side o a square is 3n + 2 the perimeter of the square is 4 (3n +2) which expression is equivalent to the perimeter
The perimeter of a square is the sum of the lengths of all four sides. Since the length of one side of this square is 3n + 2, the perimeter can be expressed as:
4(3n + 2)
Expanding this expression using the distributive property, we get:
= 4 x 3n + 4 x 2
= 12n + 8
Therefore, the expression equivalent to the perimeter of the square is 12n + 8.
4(3n + 2)
Expanding this expression using the distributive property, we get:
= 4 x 3n + 4 x 2
= 12n + 8
Therefore, the expression equivalent to the perimeter of the square is 12n + 8.
Rupa practices the Indian craft of mehndi she buys henna powder to make a dye that she uses to paint traditional designs on women 's hands for special accedes the graph shows the relationships between the number of ounces of henna and the cost.
As an AI language model, I am not able to see the graph you might be referring to as you haven't provided it. However, based on the information you have given, the graph shows the relationship between the number of ounces of henna powder that Rupa buys and the cost of buying that amount of henna. It's likely that the graph shows a positive linear relationship, which means that the cost increases as the number of ounces of henna increases. This is because Rupa needs to buy more henna powder to paint more designs on women's hands.
closets take up 92 square feet of the space of in Raya's apartment Raya uses the model below the show the portion of her apartment that is taken up by closets what is the area of Rayas entire apartment
As an AI language model, I am not able to see the model you're referring to as you haven't provided it. However, you have mentioned that the closets take up 92 square feet of space in Raya's apartment. If we assume that the closet space is the only space that is not part of the main living area of the apartment, then we can find the area of Raya's entire apartment by adding the area of the closet space to the area of the main living area.
Let's say that the area of the main living area is x square feet. Then the area of Raya's entire apartment is:
Area of entire apartment = Area of main living area + Area of closets
= x + 92 square feet
Therefore, the area of Raya's entire apartment is x + 92 square feet. However, without more information, we cannot determine the exact value of x.
Let's say that the area of the main living area is x square feet. Then the area of Raya's entire apartment is:
Area of entire apartment = Area of main living area + Area of closets
= x + 92 square feet
Therefore, the area of Raya's entire apartment is x + 92 square feet. However, without more information, we cannot determine the exact value of x.
which is a composite number 41 or 71 or 81 or 61
A composite number is an integer that has factors other than one and itself.
Out of the given options, 81 is a composite number as it has factors other than one and itself.
81 can be expressed as 3 x 3 x 3 x 3
On the other hand:
- 41 is a prime number as it has exactly two factors, one and itself.
- 71 is a prime number as it has exactly two factors, one and itself.
- 61 is a prime number as it has exactly two factors, one and itself.
Out of the given options, 81 is a composite number as it has factors other than one and itself.
81 can be expressed as 3 x 3 x 3 x 3
On the other hand:
- 41 is a prime number as it has exactly two factors, one and itself.
- 71 is a prime number as it has exactly two factors, one and itself.
- 61 is a prime number as it has exactly two factors, one and itself.
So its 81 or :/
Yes, that's correct. The composite number in the given options is 81.
The radio of max allowance to ava allowance is 4.1 to 20.5 if ava gets 5.00$ how much allowance does max get
If the ratio of Max's allowance to Ava's allowance is 4.1 to 20.5, it means that Max gets 4.1 dollars for every 20.5 dollars that Ava gets.
Let's first find the unit ratio, which is the ratio between Max's allowance and Ava's allowance if one unit of allowance is given to Ava:
4.1 to 20.5 is the same as 0.2 to 1 (by dividing both numbers by 20.5)
This means that for every $1 given to Ava, Max gets $0.2.
If Ava gets $5.00, then Max gets:
$0.2 x 5 = $1.00
Therefore, Max gets $1.00 in allowance if Ava gets $5.00 and the ratio of their allowances is 4.1 to 20.5.
Let's first find the unit ratio, which is the ratio between Max's allowance and Ava's allowance if one unit of allowance is given to Ava:
4.1 to 20.5 is the same as 0.2 to 1 (by dividing both numbers by 20.5)
This means that for every $1 given to Ava, Max gets $0.2.
If Ava gets $5.00, then Max gets:
$0.2 x 5 = $1.00
Therefore, Max gets $1.00 in allowance if Ava gets $5.00 and the ratio of their allowances is 4.1 to 20.5.
so is it 25.00$ or 0.20$ 0.25$ 1.00$
Based on the given information, we can use proportions to find out how much allowance Max would get if Ava gets $5.00.
The ratio of Max's allowance to Ava's allowance is 4.1 to 20.5, which can be simplified as 0.2 to 1 (by dividing both numbers by 20.5). This means that for every $1 given to Ava, Max gets $0.2.
If Ava gets $5.00, then we can find out how much Max gets by setting up the following proportion:
Max's allowance / Ava's allowance = $0.2 / $1
Let's substitute the given values:
Max's allowance / $5.00 = $0.2 / $1
To solve for Max's allowance, we can cross-multiply:
Max's allowance x $1 = $5.00 x $0.2
Max's allowance = $1.00
Therefore, if Ava gets $5.00, Max's allowance is $1.00.
The ratio of Max's allowance to Ava's allowance is 4.1 to 20.5, which can be simplified as 0.2 to 1 (by dividing both numbers by 20.5). This means that for every $1 given to Ava, Max gets $0.2.
If Ava gets $5.00, then we can find out how much Max gets by setting up the following proportion:
Max's allowance / Ava's allowance = $0.2 / $1
Let's substitute the given values:
Max's allowance / $5.00 = $0.2 / $1
To solve for Max's allowance, we can cross-multiply:
Max's allowance x $1 = $5.00 x $0.2
Max's allowance = $1.00
Therefore, if Ava gets $5.00, Max's allowance is $1.00.
15+x =63.75
To solve for x in the equation 15+x=63.75, we need to isolate x on one side of the equation.
We can begin by subtracting 15 from both sides of the equation:
15 + x - 15 = 63.75 - 15
Simplifying the left side gives:
x = 63.75 - 15
Calculating the right side gives:
x = 48.75
Therefore, the solution to the equation 15+x=63.75 is x = 48.75.
We can begin by subtracting 15 from both sides of the equation:
15 + x - 15 = 63.75 - 15
Simplifying the left side gives:
x = 63.75 - 15
Calculating the right side gives:
x = 48.75
Therefore, the solution to the equation 15+x=63.75 is x = 48.75.
he rides 2 miles from the born to the start of the parade then he rides 1.48 miles in the parade finally he rides 2.6 miles and back to the barn what is the total distance in miles Mr. Garza rides
The total distance that Mr. Garza rides can be found by adding up the distances of each segment of the journey. Using the information given, we get:
Total distance = 2 miles (from the barn to the start of the parade) + 1.48 miles (in the parade) + 2.6 miles (from the parade back to the barn)
= 5.08 miles
Therefore, the total distance that Mr. Garza rides is 5.08 miles.
Total distance = 2 miles (from the barn to the start of the parade) + 1.48 miles (in the parade) + 2.6 miles (from the parade back to the barn)
= 5.08 miles
Therefore, the total distance that Mr. Garza rides is 5.08 miles.
ava says that 500 divided by 50 is 10 use he drop down menus to explain why ava statement is true
Ava's statement is true because:
- 500 is the dividend representing the total number of items or units that need to be divided into groups.
- 50 is the divisor representing the number of items or units in each group.
- 10 is the quotient representing the number of groups that can be formed from the total number of items or units.
When we divide the dividend (500) by the divisor (50), we get the quotient (10) as the result. This means that we can form 10 groups of 50 items each from a total of 500 items. Therefore, Ava's statement "500 divided by 50 is 10" is true.
- 500 is the dividend representing the total number of items or units that need to be divided into groups.
- 50 is the divisor representing the number of items or units in each group.
- 10 is the quotient representing the number of groups that can be formed from the total number of items or units.
When we divide the dividend (500) by the divisor (50), we get the quotient (10) as the result. This means that we can form 10 groups of 50 items each from a total of 500 items. Therefore, Ava's statement "500 divided by 50 is 10" is true.
i forgot this part sorry the value of a blank in the hudreds place is blank times the value of a 5 in the blank place
I assume you were asking for an explanation of this statement: "The value of a blank in the hundreds place is blank times the value of a 5 in the ones place."
This statement is referring to the position of digits in a number, where the hundreds place is three digits to the left of the ones place. For example, in the number 521, the digit "5" is in the hundreds place, and the digit "1" is in the ones place.
The statement is saying that the value of the digit in the hundreds place is equal to the value of the digit in the ones place multiplied by a certain number. That number is left blank in the statement, so we can't determine its exact value without more information. However, the statement does tell us that the number is based on the relationship between the two positions.
To understand this better, let's consider an example. Let's say that the digit in the ones place is 5, and we don't know the value of the digit in the hundreds place yet. According to the statement, the value of the digit in the hundreds place is equal to the value of the digit in the ones place (which is 5) times the unknown number. So, if the unknown number is 3, then the value of the digit in the hundreds place would be:
3 x 5 = 15
Therefore, the value of the digit in the hundreds place would be 15 if the unknown number is 3 and the digit in the ones place is 5.
This statement is referring to the position of digits in a number, where the hundreds place is three digits to the left of the ones place. For example, in the number 521, the digit "5" is in the hundreds place, and the digit "1" is in the ones place.
The statement is saying that the value of the digit in the hundreds place is equal to the value of the digit in the ones place multiplied by a certain number. That number is left blank in the statement, so we can't determine its exact value without more information. However, the statement does tell us that the number is based on the relationship between the two positions.
To understand this better, let's consider an example. Let's say that the digit in the ones place is 5, and we don't know the value of the digit in the hundreds place yet. According to the statement, the value of the digit in the hundreds place is equal to the value of the digit in the ones place (which is 5) times the unknown number. So, if the unknown number is 3, then the value of the digit in the hundreds place would be:
3 x 5 = 15
Therefore, the value of the digit in the hundreds place would be 15 if the unknown number is 3 and the digit in the ones place is 5.
Which point in the coordinate plane represents the location of the ordered pair ( 3.75 - 2.25) ?
The ordered pair (3.75, -2.25) represents a point in a coordinate plane, where 3.75 is the x-coordinate and -2.25 is the y-coordinate. To plot this point, we first locate the x-coordinate on the x-axis and then locate the y-coordinate on the y-axis and plot the point where the two axes intersect.
Starting from the origin (0, 0), we move 3.75 units to the right along the x-axis and then move 2.25 units downward along the y-axis, because the y-coordinate is negative. This brings us to the point that represents the ordered pair (3.75, -2.25).
Thus, the point that represents the ordered pair (3.75, -2.25) is located at (3.75, -2.25) in the coordinate plane.
Starting from the origin (0, 0), we move 3.75 units to the right along the x-axis and then move 2.25 units downward along the y-axis, because the y-coordinate is negative. This brings us to the point that represents the ordered pair (3.75, -2.25).
Thus, the point that represents the ordered pair (3.75, -2.25) is located at (3.75, -2.25) in the coordinate plane.
So what acsess is it on L or K or N or M
As an AI language model, I don't have access to the image or diagram you might be referring to. Therefore, I can't accurately specify the access of the point (3.75, -2.25) on the coordinate plane. Can you provide additional information or context?
Which statement is true 9.07 >9.008 or 50.1< 5.01 or 123.466 >132.465
or 3.37 < 3.368
or 3.37 < 3.368
The statement that is true is:
3.37 < 3.368
This is because 3.37 is less than 3.368.
The other statements are false:
- 9.07 > 9.008 - This is true if you compare the numbers as text, but if you compare them as decimal numbers, 9.008 is greater because it has more digits after the decimal point. Therefore, the statement is false.
- 50.1 < 5.01 - This is false because 50.1 is greater than 5.01.
- 123.466 > 132.465 - This is false because 123.466 is less than 132.465.
3.37 < 3.368
This is because 3.37 is less than 3.368.
The other statements are false:
- 9.07 > 9.008 - This is true if you compare the numbers as text, but if you compare them as decimal numbers, 9.008 is greater because it has more digits after the decimal point. Therefore, the statement is false.
- 50.1 < 5.01 - This is false because 50.1 is greater than 5.01.
- 123.466 > 132.465 - This is false because 123.466 is less than 132.465.
So what's the answer ????????
The answer is:
3.37 < 3.368
This is the statement that is true out of the given options.
3.37 < 3.368
This is the statement that is true out of the given options.
max says that the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is graeter than 4/5 which statement is true
To evaluate the statement "the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is greater than 4/5," we need to simplify the expression for the product of the fractions 4/5 and 5/2, and compare it to the fraction 4/5.
Multiplying 4/5 by 5/2 gives:
(4/5) x (5/2) = (4 x 5) / (5 x 2) = 20/10 = 2
Therefore, the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is 2.
To compare the fraction 2 to 4/5, we can convert both fractions to have the same denominator:
2 = 20/10
Comparing 20/10 to 4/5, we see that:
20/10 > 4/5
Therefore, the statement "the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is greater than 4/5" is true.
Multiplying 4/5 by 5/2 gives:
(4/5) x (5/2) = (4 x 5) / (5 x 2) = 20/10 = 2
Therefore, the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is 2.
To compare the fraction 2 to 4/5, we can convert both fractions to have the same denominator:
2 = 20/10
Comparing 20/10 to 4/5, we see that:
20/10 > 4/5
Therefore, the statement "the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is greater than 4/5" is true.
No which is greater than 1 one sorry I didn't tell you. :(
Thanks for providing the additional information. To re-evaluate the statement "the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is greater than 4/5 and greater than 1," we need to simplify the expression for the product of the fractions 4/5 and 5/2.
Multiplying 4/5 by 5/2 gives:
(4/5) x (5/2) = (4 x 5) / (5 x 2) = 20/10 = 2
Therefore, the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is 2.
Comparing 2 to 4/5 and 1, we see that:
2 > 1
and
2 > 4/5
Therefore, the statement "the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is greater than 4/5 and greater than 1" is true.
Multiplying 4/5 by 5/2 gives:
(4/5) x (5/2) = (4 x 5) / (5 x 2) = 20/10 = 2
Therefore, the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is 2.
Comparing 2 to 4/5 and 1, we see that:
2 > 1
and
2 > 4/5
Therefore, the statement "the product of 4/5 and 5/2 is greater than 4/5 and greater than 1" is true.