BP

Question

Blake Patino
Dec 7 5:56pm

Reply from Blake Patino
I would say that an eye for an eye is fair to a certain extent. Obviously if someone were to go around and murder multiple people he should rot in jail for the rest of his life and there isn't a possibility to go an eye for an eye for a situation like that. But I feel like the thought of an eye for an eye would lower the crime tremendously. I can't ever see the United States implementing an eye for an eye into their justice system. Complications behind an eye for an eye would cause problems in the system and I don't think there would be a fair way to deal punishment even though I think it would be interesting and a decent idea.

I don't think it is smart to allow talking on a hand-held phone while driving is a good law to pass for other states. Nowadays technology is so advanced to where cars most likely have hands free communications. Obviously if you have a really important phone call you need to make you probably should but you can put lives in risk if you are distracted on the road and I just believe it is smart to create laws that can save a life. Even though you might not think of it most people know someone who has gotten into a car wreck before and that shares how common it is and not every outcome is a fender bender. Phones are one of the many causes accidents occur and I just think it is smart to try to cut that down as much as possible. If your phone call is really important and you don't have hands free maybe pull over. Also if you have to go under the law depending on the reasoning of the phone call I am sure you would be dismissed if you have good reasoning.

I think that technology goes both ways with education. I feel like nowadays technology can benefit a student and almost act almost as a tutor, but technology can almost give you anything you want and there are really smart ways to use technology now such as AI. Students can't use AI their whole life though when working a job and I think that is well known and pushes students away from it and towards actually learning. You get what you want out of technology when paired with education. I think it is fair to say that technology benefits students trying to learn but can cause trouble down the line in the real world for students abusing technology in school.

In Stephen King's essay when he says that "we're all mentally ill" I don't think that he referred to us all as humans actually being mentally ill. I think that he refers to a physic factor sort of like emotions and impulses that make us all human beings. I do sort of like horror movies to a certain extent like a series like Halloween or scream, but I prefer sci-fi movies like Interstellar, Marvel, etc. I prefer these movies because the futuristic aspect and overall story and graphics of the films. Personally, I am a big fan of movies and I like a lot of genres but Sci-fi would have to take the cake.

My argumentative essay is going to be about Drug use in sports. Drug use is sports is not fair towards competition and can lead to life threatening injuries depending on the sport. I personally stand for having higher punishments to those who use drugs to boost performance in their respected sports. My thesis statement will be "Athletes that use performance enhancing drugs harms the fairness of sports, the risk of health, and overall sets a bad example for the younger generation"





Reply to post from Blake PatinoReply

Answer 1

Hi Blake,

Your insights on various topics are thought-provoking and offer a lot to consider.

Regarding your thoughts on "an eye for an eye," you raise an important point about the complexities of justice. While it can seem fair in theory, the practical implications in a legal system could create more complications than solutions. The idea of proportional justice can be enticing, but as you noted, not every crime has a straightforward correlation to a punishment. Perhaps discussing restorative justice models could provide interesting alternatives to explore?

On the issue of phone use while driving, I completely agree with you. Hands-free technology has come a long way, but the potential for distraction remains high even with these advancements. Laws aimed at reducing distractions are crucial for public safety. Your suggestion of pulling over for important calls reinforces the idea that we must prioritize safety above convenience.

Your perspective on technology and education resonates well, especially in today’s rapidly evolving landscape. While technology can be a valuable learning tool, it's crucial that students also develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills that they will need in the workforce. Balancing the benefits of technological advancements with the necessity for foundational skills is indeed a tricky but vital challenge in education.

Stephen King's quote about mental illness touches on an interesting aspect of human nature. Your interpretation highlights the emotional depth that makes us human, which I find accurate. It’s fascinating how horror and sci-fi tap into our fears and curiosities about humanity and the unknown. Your preference for sci-fi films speaks to a desire for imaginative storytelling and innovation—definitely a genre that provokes thought!

Your upcoming argumentative essay on drug use in sports sounds compelling. The integrity of competition is essential, and the long-term effects of performance-enhancing drugs can be drastically negative for athletes' health and the spirit of the sport. Your thesis is strong; it emphasizes the broader implications of drug use, not only on fairness but also on the examples being set for younger athletes. I look forward to seeing how you develop your arguments. Best of luck with your essay!

Overall, your reflections bring a valuable perspective to these discussions. Keep up the great work!

Best, [Your Name]