The fairest and most effective counterclaim is: "There are places where tap water is not drinkable, and in these places, bottled water is distributed in emergency situations and is a lifesaver."
This counterclaim addresses a significant concern—that bottled water serves as a critical resource in areas where safe drinking water is not available, highlighting the need for bottled water in emergencies and specific living conditions. It acknowledges the environmental issues while also presenting a practical necessity for bottled water in certain contexts. This adds depth to the argument by emphasizing the importance of accessibility to clean water over solely focusing on environmental impacts.