Body Paragraph 3: The Counterclaim and Rebuttal!

Question

Proponents of year-round school argue that it can lead to improved academic achievement by reducing the
"summer slide," where students forget some of what they learned during the long summer break. Research published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development suggests that shorter, more frequent breaks help students retain information better and stay engaged in their learning. Additionally, supporters suggest that year-round schooling can provide more opportunities for remedial education and enrichment programs during the breaks, which could help struggling students catch up. However, studies on the effectiveness of year-round schooling in improving academic performance have shown mixed results, with some research indicating that the gains are minimal and not worth the trade-offs in student well-being and family life. Therefore, while the potential benefits of year-round schooling are worth considering, they do not outweigh the drawbacks, making the traditional school calendar a better option for most students and families.
Claim: Year round school is not a good idea
1.What is the Counterclaim? Hi lite in yellow
2. Does the counterclaim cite evidence? Hi lite in blue
3.Look at the rebuttal - what is/are the transition word(s) used to move from the counterclaim to the rebuttal? Hi lite that in any other color than yellow or blue!
4. Do you see evidence cited in the rebuttal? What are your thoughts?

Answer 1

1. Counterclaim: Proponents of year-round school argue that it can lead to improved academic achievement by reducing the "summer slide," where students forget some of what they learned during the long summer break. Research published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development suggests that shorter, more frequent breaks help students retain information better and stay engaged in their learning. Additionally, supporters suggest that year-round schooling can provide more opportunities for remedial education and enrichment programs during the breaks, which could help struggling students catch up.

2. Evidence cited in the counterclaim: Research published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development suggests that shorter, more frequent breaks help students retain information better and stay engaged in their learning.

3. Transition words used to move from the counterclaim to the rebuttal: However,

4. Evidence cited in the rebuttal: Yes, studies on the effectiveness of year-round schooling in improving academic performance have shown mixed results, with some research indicating that the gains are minimal and not worth the trade-offs in student well-being and family life. My thoughts are that the rebuttal effectively addresses the counterclaim by providing substantial evidence that challenges the claimed benefits of year-round schooling. The mention of mixed results and potential drawbacks adds credibility to the argument against the counterclaim.