To determine if Beth is correct, we need to solve the system of equations to find when the two salaries are equal:
-
The first equation is for East Conference games: \( y = 40x - 25 \)
-
The second equation is for West Conference games: \( y = 35x - 5 \)
To find the intersection point of the two equations (the value of \(x\) where the salaries are equal), we can set the two equations equal to each other:
\[ 40x - 25 = 35x - 5 \]
Now, we will solve for \(x\):
-
Subtract \(35x\) from both sides: \[ 40x - 35x - 25 = -5 \] \[ 5x - 25 = -5 \]
-
Add 25 to both sides: \[ 5x = 20 \]
-
Divide by 5: \[ x = 4 \]
Now, we can find \(y\) by substituting \(x = 4\) into either equation. Using the first equation:
\[ y = 40(4) - 25 = 160 - 25 = 135 \]
So the solution to the system is \( (4, 135) \). This means that when the referee has worked 4 games, both pay equations yield a salary of $135.
Beth stated that at 135 games, the referee would earn the same salary of $4 for each conference game. However, this is incorrect based on the solution we computed. The x-value that corresponds to equal salaries is 4 games, not 135 games.
So the correct response is:
No, she interpreted the solution of (4, 135) incorrectly.