Based on what you know about Native American relationships with Spanish colonists, what can you infer about the way the Spanish viewed Native Americans?(1 point)

Responses

Spanish colonists felt that they were superior to Native Americans.
Spanish colonists felt that they were superior to Native Americans.

Spanish colonists had mixed feelings towards Native Americans.
Spanish colonists had mixed feelings towards Native Americans.

Spanish colonists saw Native Americans as their equals.
Spanish colonists saw Native Americans as their equals.

Spanish colonists admired Native Americans.

11 answers

Based on historical context, the most accurate inference would be that Spanish colonists felt that they were superior to Native Americans. The Spanish colonization efforts often involved asserting control over indigenous populations, viewing them through a lens of superiority that justified their conquests and the imposition of their culture, religion, and economic systems. This perspective led to the exploitation and oppression of many Native American communities. While there might have been instances of admiration or alliance, the overarching view was one of superiority.

Which of the following were problems faced by the English colonists at Jamestown?

(1 point)
Responses

The settlers believed that farming was beneath them, so they did not plant crops for the winter.
The settlers believed that farming was beneath them, so they did not plant crops for the winter.

The colony employed many indentured servants and paying them was difficult.
The colony employed many indentured servants and paying them was difficult.

They settled in an unsecure location and were vulnerable to Spanish attack.
They settled in an unsecure location and were vulnerable to Spanish attack.

The location of the colony made life difficult for the settlers.

Out of the options provided, the statement that best describes a problem faced by the English colonists at Jamestown is:

The settlers believed that farming was beneath them, so they did not plant crops for the winter.

This ideology contributed to food shortages and hardship, particularly in the early years of the colony. The settlers were primarily gentlemen and did not initially prioritize agriculture, which ultimately led to severe challenges in sustaining the settlement. Other options may have some truth, but they do not capture the primary struggles as directly as the first option.

Why was the economy in the New England Colonies different from the economy in the Middle Colonies? (1 point)
Responses

The settlers in New England were able to grow abundant crops in the rich soil available there.
The settlers in New England were able to grow abundant crops in the rich soil available there.

The settlers in the Middle Colonies used resources from the forest to trade for needed goods.
The settlers in the Middle Colonies used resources from the forest to trade for needed goods.

The Middle Colonies lacked strong leadership to keep settlers focused on their work.
The Middle Colonies lacked strong leadership to keep settlers focused on their work.

Religious beliefs affected the type and amount of work people could do.

The most accurate response that explains why the economy in the New England Colonies was different from that in the Middle Colonies is:

Religious beliefs affected the type and amount of work people could do.

In New England, Puritanism influenced community structures and work ethics, leading to mixed economies that included small-scale farming, fishing, and trade. The settlers often concentrated on subsistence farming and other community-oriented work due to their religious beliefs and social structures. On the other hand, the Middle Colonies had a more diverse economy that included farming, trading, and crafts, influenced by a mix of religious and cultural backgrounds, which allowed for more varied agricultural practices and a focus on commerce.

While the other options touch on various aspects of the economies, the influence of religious beliefs is a significant factor that distinctly shaped these colonial economies.

In the spring of 1607, a group of 105 colonists, funded by the Virginia Company, arrived in Virginia. They sailed into Chesapeake Bay and began building houses along the James River. They named their tiny outpost Jamestown after their king. The settlers of Jamestown hoped to make a profit by finding gold or other riches. They also hoped to discover a water route to Asia. Further, they wanted to claim the region for England.

The colonists soon discovered that Jamestown was located in a swampy area. The water was unhealthy, and mosquitoes spread malaria. Many settlers suffered or died from disease. Historians have long debated the reason the settlers chose the location they did. One of the main reasons was security: they located their settlement in a place where Spanish ships would be unlikely to find them. If the Spanish did discover Jamestown, its location would make it difficult for Spanish ships to fire directly at the settlement.

Use the excerpt to answer the question.



According to this excerpt from the text what was the main accomplishment of the Jamestown settlers?

(1 point)
Responses

setting up a protected colony
setting up a protected colony

fighting the spread of disease
fighting the spread of disease

discovering a water route to Asia
discovering a water route to Asia

locating gold and other riches

According to the excerpt, the main accomplishment of the Jamestown settlers was setting up a protected colony. The text emphasizes that the location of Jamestown was chosen for security reasons, particularly to avoid detection by Spanish ships and to provide a defensible position for the settlement. The other options, such as fighting disease, discovering a water route to Asia, or locating gold and riches, are mentioned as hopes or challenges but do not represent the main accomplishment as described in the excerpt.

How was the initial reason most settlers came to New Netherland different from the reasons most settlers came to the surrounding English colonies?(1 point)
Responses

The English mostly came for religious reasons while many immigrants settled in New Netherland to gain wealth in the booming fur trade.
The English mostly came for religious reasons while many immigrants settled in New Netherland to gain wealth in the booming fur trade.

The English mostly came for wealth, while many immigrants settled in New Netherland to enjoy religious freedom.
The English mostly came for wealth, while many immigrants settled in New Netherland to enjoy religious freedom.

The English mostly came for religious reasons, while many immigrants settled in New Netherland to mine gold and silver.
The English mostly came for religious reasons, while many immigrants settled in New Netherland to mine gold and silver.

The English mostly came for wealth and glory while many immigrants settled in New Netherland to prosper as tobacco farmers.

The correct response is:

The English mostly came for religious reasons while many immigrants settled in New Netherland to gain wealth in the booming fur trade.

This highlights a key distinction between the motivations of settlers in New Netherland and those in English colonies. Many English settlers, particularly groups like the Puritans and Pilgrims, sought refuge from religious persecution and aimed to establish communities based on their beliefs. In contrast, the Dutch settlers in New Netherland were primarily focused on economic opportunities, particularly in the fur trade, rather than seeking to establish a religiously driven society.

Based on your text and this reading, why was land near water so important for French settlers?(1 point)
Responses

Settlers depended on water from rivers and lakes for their crops.
Settlers depended on water from rivers and lakes for their crops.

Settlers used water routes to hunt for food.
Settlers used water routes to hunt for food.

Settlers continued to look for a Northwest Passage across the continent.
Settlers continued to look for a Northwest Passage across the continent.

Settlers relied on water routes for transportation

The most accurate response regarding why land near water was so important for French settlers is:

Settlers relied on water routes for transportation.

Access to rivers and lakes provided crucial transportation routes for trade, communication, and migration. These waterways were essential for moving goods and people, which was particularly important for the fur trade and economic activities in French settlements. While the other options may contain elements of truth (like the dependency on water for crops), the significance of transportation would be considered the most critical factor.