Based on the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, it would be legal for you to wear an armband to school in order to protest an action taken by our government if it did not create a distraction. What is the basis for this?(1 point) Responses protected symbolic speech protected symbolic speech Establishment Clause Establishment Clause freedom to petition freedom to petition freedom to assemble peacefully
3 answers
The basis for this statement is that the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines established that students have the right to engage in symbolic speech, as long as it does not create a substantial disruption or interfere with the rights of others. The ruling in this case affirmed that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." Therefore, wearing an armband to protest an action taken by the government would be considered protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment, as long as it does not cause a significant distraction or disruption at the school.
shorter
The basis for this statement is the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, which established that students have the right to engage in symbolic speech in schools, as long as it does not disrupt the learning environment or interfere with the rights of others. Wearing an armband to peacefully protest a government action would be considered protected symbolic speech under this ruling.
1 answer