Supporters believe the CROWN Act is necessary to address systemic issues of hair discrimination that disproportionately affect people of color, particularly those with textured hair styles like braids, locs, and afros. They argue that such discrimination further reinforces racial stereotypes and perpetuates a culture of exclusion and bias.
Rep. Janelle Bynum highlights the need for education among lawmakers regarding the normalization of white dominant culture and how it impacts individuals with different hair textures. By introducing legislation like the CROWN Act, advocates aim to challenge and change societal norms that devalue natural hairstyles and create environments where individuals can express themselves freely without fear of discrimination in workplaces, schools, or other public spaces.
The pushback that legislators like Anthony faced when first introducing the CROWN Act underscores the broader social and political challenges associated with addressing this issue. The dismissiveness from some lawmakers reflects a lack of awareness and understanding of the significance of hair and its cultural and personal implications for many individuals. This growing momentum for the CROWN Act signifies a shift toward recognizing and valuing diversity in personal expression and combating prejudices rooted in cultural norms.