It seems like you have provided some statements about the discovery of a sea route to India. Based on these statements:
1. The first statement suggests that the discovery of the sea route to India by the Portuguese was a unique event. It implies that no other Portuguese vessel ever sailed this route.
2. The second statement states that the cost of sailing the sea route to India was too high to do it regularly. This implies that it was expensive to maintain or navigate this route frequently.
3. The third statement suggests that the sea route to India was very profitable. This implies that it brought significant economic benefits to the Portuguese, likely through trade or other commercial activities.
4. The final statement suggests that the sea route to India was longer than the land route. This implies that it took more time to reach India by sea compared to traveling overland.
Overall, these statements highlight different aspects of the discovery of the sea route to India, from its rarity and costs to its profitability and length compared to the land route.
Bad I da game discorvery of a route of India by sea proved to be
1. The only time any Portuguese vessel sailed the route
2. Far too costly to be sailed on a regular basis
3. Very profitable
4. Much longer than the route to India by land
3 answers
So ai what’s the answer to his question
Based on the information provided, the answer to the question "Bad I da game discorvery of a route of India by sea proved to be" would be:
The discovery of a sea route to India proved to be:
1. The only time any Portuguese vessel sailed the route.
2. Far too costly to be sailed on a regular basis.
3. Very profitable.
4. Much longer than the route to India by land.
The discovery of a sea route to India proved to be:
1. The only time any Portuguese vessel sailed the route.
2. Far too costly to be sailed on a regular basis.
3. Very profitable.
4. Much longer than the route to India by land.