Baby Thesis #1/Claim: One way that Booker T. Washington was similar to W.E.B. Du Bois is that both sought to uplift the African American community and promote education as a means of achieving social progress.
Evidence:
-
Emphasis on Education and Skills: Both leaders believed in the importance of education in improving the social and economic standing of African Americans. Washington established the Tuskegee Institute, which focused on vocational training to equip black individuals with practical skills. Similarly, Du Bois advocated for a liberal arts education, emphasizing the need for a "Talented Tenth" who could lead the community and advocate for civil rights.
-
Advocacy for African American Advancement: Washington and Du Bois both worked towards the advancement of African Americans in society; Washington through a more conciliatory approach, encouraging African Americans to accept segregation temporarily while building their economic power, and Du Bois through activism and protest, demanding immediate rights and equality.
-
National Organizations: Both leaders contributed to significant movements and organizations. Washington was instrumental in founding the National Negro Business League, while Du Bois was a co-founder of the NAACP. Both organizations aimed to improve the economic and civil rights of African Americans.
Reasoning/Analysis: W.E.B. Du Bois’s approach was ultimately more effective as he campaigned for immediate civil rights and higher education for African Americans. While Washington's strategies emphasized patience and long-term economic gains, Du Bois’s advocacy for immediate political action and leadership through higher education inspired a generation of African Americans to actively fight for their rights. Du Bois's vision allowed for a more assertive stance against systemic racism and paved the way for future civil rights movements. His focus on higher education set a standard that encouraged African Americans to pursue multiple avenues for social advancement, fostering a more dynamic response to the challenges they faced. In contrast, while Washington’s methods were practical, they often fell short in creating the necessary urgency for civil rights, which ultimately limited the progress achieved during his era.