The authority of the author can be determined by examining their credentials and background in the subject matter they are reporting on. If the author is a recognized expert in the field or has relevant experience and qualifications, then they can be considered an authority on the topic. If the author's credentials are questionable or if they have a history of inaccuracies or bias in their reporting, then their authority may be called into question.
Bias in reporting can be identified through various means, such as the use of emotionally charged language, selective presentation of facts, and a lack of balance in the reporting. Authors with a clear bias may only present information that supports their viewpoint while ignoring or downplaying evidence that contradicts it.
To determine an author's bias, it is important to consider the language they use, the sources they cite, and any conflicts of interest they may have. Additionally, examining the publication or platform where the information is being reported can also provide clues about potential biases. It is always important to critically evaluate the information presented and consider multiple sources to get a more balanced perspective.
Authority: Does the author have authority on the information they are reporting
about? What is their bias? How can you tell?
1 answer
1 answer