At the next local election, a referendum is on the ballot that proposes to enact a noise ordinance to restrict excessive noises between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM. The Daily investigated this ordinance to inform its readers as they decide whether to vote “yes” or “no.”

Question

Supporters of the ordinance claim that this law would lead to a more peaceful and better rested community. This is because around 50% of town residents are still sleeping until 7 AM, and so they are unnecessarily woken by loud noises such as car horns and lawnmowers. For example, town resident Julia Smith often does not return from work as an ER nurse until after midnight, yet is regularly woken by her neighbors honking their horns at 5:30 AM. In addition, kids who need to be up for school by 6 AM often cannot fall asleep by 10 PM due to excessive noise.

However, opponents of the ordinance believe that this law would violate their rights. In the words of resident Derek Green, “What happens if I need to shout or honk my horn in case of an emergency? Will I have to worry about neighbors calling the police?”

What do you think? We hope you will consider this information as you make your selection at the ballot box this election season.

Question
Use the informational text to answer the question.
Which additional detail would be most effective to add to paragraph 3?(1 point)
Responses choose the correct answer carefully and tell me why is that suppose to be correct

Resident Lola Stetson believes that the ordinance is not needed and would be too difficult to enforce.
Resident Lola Stetson believes that the ordinance is not needed and would be too difficult to enforce.

A few residents have complained that their health has been affected by being woken at night by loud noises.
A few residents have complained that their health has been affected by being woken at night by loud noises.

It appears that just a few residents have been causing most of the noise at night.
It appears that just a few residents have been causing most of the noise at night.

“It shouldn’t be that difficult to respect one’s neighbors and not wake them up at all hours of the night,” said resident Gabrielle Tafoya.
“It shouldn’t be that difficult to respect one’s neighbors and not wake them up at all hours of the night,” said resident Gabrielle Tafoya.
Skip to navigation

Answer 1

The additional detail that would be most effective to add to paragraph 3 is:

“A few residents have complained that their health has been affected by being woken at night by loud noises.”

Reasoning: This detail directly addresses the concerns raised by supporters of the noise ordinance and reinforces the argument for its necessity. It highlights a tangible impact of excessive noise on residents’ well-being, emphasizing the potential health consequences of sleep disturbances. This information strengthens the case for the ordinance by providing evidence that the issue is not merely about annoyance but rather about individual health and community welfare.

In contrast, the other options either do not provide evidence that supports the claims made about noise effects (like the opinion of Lola Stetson or Gabrielle Tafoya) or could suggest that noise issues are localized to a few bad actors without addressing the broader community concerns (the third option).